CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM > OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD

Overestimation of pressure drop in very narrow channels - rhoSimpleFoam

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   April 30, 2024, 09:27
Default Overestimation of pressure drop in very narrow channels - rhoSimpleFoam
  #1
New Member
 
Maciej Majchrzak
Join Date: Aug 2021
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0
Maciej Majchrzak is on a distinguished road
I have a problem with the heat exchanger calculations. The cool side of the exchanger has herringbone (zigzag shaped) fins - very narrow slots, 1 by 4mm, separated by even thinner sheet metal.
Despite a very accurate grid with correct wall layers (30 layers, y+ less than 1), I get pressure drop values several times higher than those measured in the experiment - (2500 Pa vs 500 Pa). The turbulence model used is kOmegaSST, the flow is velocity driven. The discrepancy is similar over a wide range of velocities.
I tried:
-various solver settings, from the most stable to the most accurate
-tuning of turbulence model coefficients
-transition to rhoPimpleFoam
-rhoPimpleFoam with LES turbulence model
-the transonic option
-using wall functions at a grid with y+ about 50
-different methods of determining wall distance,
obtaining only small changes in pressure drop.

Even more perplexing is that on the hot side of the exchanger the same settings give results almost identical to the measurements from the experiment - the difference being the completely different geometry, the short, straight ribs located further apart. Likewise, thermal analysis of the exchanger using chtMultiRegionSimpleFoam with a porous medium yielded results that almost perfectly coincided with the measurements.
The pressure increase is uniform along the length of the channel, the calculations are stable and convergent. Is there any reason why OpenFOAM could overestimate the pressure in a narrow channel? The surprising convergence of the result obtained by different methods and by two engineers even led me and my client to suspect measurement errors in the experiment.

I am attaching zip files with boundary conditions and solver settings.
I would appreciate any insights,
MM
Attached Images
File Type: jpg post.jpg (25.8 KB, 6 views)
Attached Files
File Type: zip post.zip (5.5 KB, 2 views)
Maciej Majchrzak is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
compressible, komega sst model, pressure drop, rhosimplefoam

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
rhoSimpleFoam no pressure drop? Shylos OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 0 August 29, 2022 08:09
viscosity udf don't use correct temperature and strain rate rezvani Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming 8 May 27, 2021 05:40
total pressure and pressure drop omaralyahia CFX 5 July 14, 2015 08:13
Pipe Flow - Pressure Drop Daniel L FLOW-3D 2 December 10, 2010 04:23
Hydrostatic pressure in 2-phase flow modeling (long) DS & HB Main CFD Forum 0 January 8, 2000 15:00


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 16:47.