
[Sponsors] 
January 28, 2009, 05:59 
Hi Foamers,
I'm playing wit

#1 
Senior Member
Francois Beaubert
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Lille, France
Posts: 147
Rep Power: 17 
Hi Foamers,
I'm playing with the simpleFoam solver for a simple open rotor/stator laminar flow configuration but I'm not able to reach the steady state of the flow. The angular velocity on the rotor is around 300 tr/min so a Reynolds number (based on the rotor radius) around 2.10^5 is expected. According to the literature the flow is still laminar. So I try simpleFoam with no turbulence models but even if convergence seems ok I'm not able to reach this steady state. Perhaps the flow is locally turbulent or in transition and a RANS model could be the way to go. Some experiences on those kind of flows ? Here is one of my last iteration output in the log file: Time = 95000 DILUPBiCG: Solving for Ux, Initial residual = 0.0114524, Final residual = 0.000374143, No Iterations 2 DILUPBiCG: Solving for Uy, Initial residual = 0.00827667, Final residual = 0.000238708, No Iterations 2 DILUPBiCG: Solving for Uz, Initial residual = 0.00574431, Final residual = 0.000142418, No Iterations 2 DICPCG: Solving for p, Initial residual = 0.0246974, Final residual = 0.000246175, No Iterations 54 time step continuity errors : sum local = 7.81603e05, global = 2.14943e06, cumulative = 0.07646 ExecutionTime = 182884 s ClockTime = 183024 s Any advices to get better convergence to reach the steady state of the flow ? My setup is as follow: =========== :fvSchemes: =========== ddtSchemes { default steadyState; } gradSchemes { default Gauss linear; grad(p) Gauss linear; grad(U) Gauss linear; } divSchemes { default none; div(phi,U) Gauss upwind; div(phi,k) Gauss upwind; div(phi,epsilon) Gauss upwind; div(phi,R) Gauss upwind; div(R) Gauss linear; div(phi,nuTilda) Gauss upwind; div((nuEff*dev(grad(U).T()))) Gauss linear; } laplacianSchemes { default none; laplacian(nuEff,U) Gauss linear corrected; laplacian((1A(U)),p) Gauss linear corrected; laplacian(DkEff,k) Gauss linear corrected; laplacian(DepsilonEff,epsilon) Gauss linear corrected; laplacian(DREff,R) Gauss linear corrected; laplacian(DnuTildaEff,nuTilda) Gauss linear corrected; } interpolationSchemes { default linear; interpolate(U) linear; } snGradSchemes { default corrected; } fluxRequired { default no; p; } ============ :fvSolution: ============ solvers { p PCG { preconditioner DIC; tolerance 1e06; relTol 0.01; }; U PBiCG { preconditioner DILU; tolerance 1e05; relTol 0.1; }; k PBiCG { preconditioner DILU; tolerance 1e05; relTol 0.1; }; epsilon PBiCG { preconditioner DILU; tolerance 1e05; relTol 0.1; }; R PBiCG { preconditioner DILU; tolerance 1e05; relTol 0.1; }; nuTilda PBiCG { preconditioner DILU; tolerance 1e05; relTol 0.1; }; } SIMPLE { nNonOrthogonalCorrectors 0; } relaxationFactors { p 0.3; U 0.7; k 0.7; epsilon 0.7; R 0.7; nuTilda 0.7; } =============== :RASProperties: =============== RASModel laminar; turbulence off; printCoeffs on; laminarCoeffs { } Thank you very much. Have a nice day Francois 

February 25, 2009, 11:33 
Hi all, Hopefully I have so

#2 
Senior Member
Francois Beaubert
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Lille, France
Posts: 147
Rep Power: 17 
Hi all,
Hopefully I have some time to go back on this case ... My runs don't reach the steady state and convergence is still not achieved with residuals not so low. I've attached some pictures to better describe my case. It's a simple rotor/stator configuration with a hole in the stator. rotor_stator.jpg I've also attached the distribution of the u,v,w velocity components on a radial line between the rotor and stator. velocity_distribution.jpg You can see that steady state is not reach here: one can observe large variation of u,v,w profiles between iteration 80000 and 90000. The behaviour is the same for a greater number of iteration (currently I'm at 120000 iterations). Below you can see isocontours of the u component around the rotor/stator and one can note a "shear layer" near the rotor which oscillates with iterations (this trend is also observed on the uvw distribution figure just above) rotor_stator_Ux.jpg And to conclude below are the evolution of residuals with the iterations for Ux and Uy for example: UxFinalRes.jpg UyFinalRes.jpg So I still have a few questions: * what is the best procedure to obtain a steady state * is my computational domain too small (Ddomain = 4rotor and Hdomain = 3Drotor)for this problem with a "feedback" of the outlet boundary condition ? I will be very pleased to have some advices/ideas frome somone on those points and forgive me for this long post. Thanks you very much Regards Francois Last edited by francois; March 18, 2009 at 15:56. Reason: Add images 

February 25, 2009, 11:40 
Oup's sorry for the images
Wi

#3 
Senior Member
Francois Beaubert
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Lille, France
Posts: 147
Rep Power: 17 
Oup's sorry for the images
Will try again here : Computationaldomain: distribution of the u,v,w velocity components on a radial line between the rotor and stator: u v w contours: Residuals: 

February 25, 2009, 11:50 
Humm ... sorry
Don't work her

#4 
Senior Member
Francois Beaubert
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Lille, France
Posts: 147
Rep Power: 17 
Humm ... sorry
Don't work here with firefox 3.06 on ubuntu 8.10 What the best way to send/attach picture or files on the message board ? I use: \ image{foo} or \ attach{foo} with no space between \ and the after word It seems that I always have to struggle until death to be able to send some files or images here. 

February 25, 2009, 22:46 
I think your syntax is probabl

#5 
Member
Andrew King
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Perth, Western Australia, Australia
Posts: 82
Rep Power: 17 
I think your syntax is probably fine, but there's a very small limit on image sizes, 50K I think. It doesn't stop you from posting, but won't show the images.
Less than 50K is fine. Cheers Andrew
__________________
Dr Andrew King Fluid Dynamics Research Group Curtin University 

February 26, 2009, 05:18 
Thanks Andrew for your advice

#6 
Senior Member
Francois Beaubert
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Lille, France
Posts: 147
Rep Power: 17 
Thanks Andrew for your advice
But my images sizes are always under 50k and I never saw the dialog for file upload So the problem seems to be elsewhere ... Cheers Francois 

February 27, 2009, 00:19 
Hmmm, hopefully it will all ge

#7 
Member
Andrew King
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Perth, Western Australia, Australia
Posts: 82
Rep Power: 17 
Hmmm, hopefully it will all get betted with the new forum software.
Cheers Andrew
__________________
Dr Andrew King Fluid Dynamics Research Group Curtin University 

March 18, 2009, 15:59 

#8 
Senior Member
Francois Beaubert
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Lille, France
Posts: 147
Rep Power: 17 
I've just modified the first post and was able to include some of the images which could not be posted in the last forum...
Yeah ... the new forum is better 

November 19, 2009, 13:33 
Same problem too...

#9 
New Member
Valerio Novaresio
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Polonghera, Cuneo, Italy
Posts: 27
Rep Power: 17 
I have the same convergence problem... Can someone help us?
__________________
...The best way to acquire new knowledge is to share it... 

Thread Tools  Search this Thread 
Display Modes  


Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
How to reach steady state solution  Sally  FLUENT  11  July 27, 2018 08:01 
Convergence problem using simpleFoam steady state  vvqf  OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD  12  May 18, 2011 07:51 
time to reach steady state with transient simulati  prabhu  CFX  2  April 21, 2008 10:18 
What if I use turbfoam instead of simplefoam what is steady turblence  lakeat  OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD  4  January 18, 2008 12:13 
Time to reach steady state for cavity flow?  Quarkz  Main CFD Forum  8  July 15, 2005 21:42 