# Problem with turbFoam

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 September 29, 2008, 15:06 Hi All, I need some clarifi #1 Senior Member   Senthil Kabilan Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 113 Rep Power: 10 Hi All, I need some clarification with the Kepsilon turbulence model. I have computed a steady state solution for the following geometry (Figure A) using simpleFoam with Kepsilon model. The boundary conditions include a zero pressure at the inlet and a pressure of -10 pa at all the eight outlets. There was no problem with the convergence. On investigating the results, the pressure at the cross section AA` was -3.91 pa and the mass flux was 1.77e-04 m^3/sec. I have another geometry (Figure B), which is a subset of the aforementioned model. When a pressure of -3.91 pa was applied at the two outlets with no change in any of the boundary or the solver settings, the expectation was that the massflux would be ~1.77e-04 m^3/sec (at the same location). Instead it was 1.94e-04 m^3/sec. So I fine-tuned the pressure at the outlets to match the massflux of 1.77e-04 m^3/sec. The final pressures at the two outlets which yielded a massflux of 1.77e-04 m^3/sec was – 3.47 pa. My question is… why do I see a difference of 11.03% in pressure for the same massflux and the same geometry? Am I missing something? Any thoughts or suggestions? Thanks Senthil Kabilan

 September 29, 2008, 17:09 Hi Senthil, One guess: If y #2 Member   Ola Widlund Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Sweden Posts: 87 Rep Power: 10 Hi Senthil, One guess: If you look at the velocity distribution in the outlets of Geometry B, and compare with equivalent cross-section in Geometry A, the velocity distributions in the cross-section are probably not the same. I am not chocked by the differences you see. The mathematical properties of a boundary condition does differ from that of an arbitrary cross-section in the middle of a developing flow. As a general rule, boundary conditions should be placed some distance away from the regions you're really interested in, and/or in a zone of well-developed flow. /Ola

 September 29, 2008, 17:43 Hi Ola, Thanks for the feed #3 Senior Member   Senthil Kabilan Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 113 Rep Power: 10 Hi Ola, Thanks for the feedback! So there is nothing wrong in what I see. It is just the way it is! Hrv: Thanks for the email. Regards, Senthil

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post dinonettis OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 64 June 22, 2010 09:58 ivanyao OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 6 January 11, 2009 08:41 sivakumar OpenFOAM Pre-Processing 7 August 28, 2008 04:45 hsieh OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 12 July 23, 2008 07:40 williamscn OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 3 September 19, 2007 11:55

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:30.