|
[Sponsors] |
MRFZonesC questions what is the mesh_V and why only Coriolis force no centrifugal force |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
April 3, 2008, 04:00 |
http://www.cfd-online.com/Open
|
#21 |
Senior Member
|
|
|
April 3, 2008, 04:01 |
b absolute velocity (at the sa
|
#22 |
Senior Member
|
b absolute velocity (at the same conditon) calculated by CFX
|
|
April 3, 2008, 04:03 |
http://www.cfd-online.com/Open
|
#23 |
Senior Member
|
|
|
April 3, 2008, 04:06 |
Hi
i am sorry.too too much t
|
#24 |
Senior Member
|
Hi
i am sorry.too too much try maybe.and also there is no velocity(U=0)in hub and shroud boundays in my result.but i think there should be angular velocity like mixvessl2d'rotor. i do not know why,can you help me ? |
|
April 3, 2008, 04:11 |
I agree something is strange i
|
#25 |
Senior Member
Dragos
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 648
Rep Power: 20 |
I agree something is strange in picture a and b. It looks like you are rotating the impeller in opposite direction to the one presented from cfx. However, what you show in a and b cannot be relative velocities since they are not along the blades (as seen in the first picture from cfx).
Dragos |
|
April 3, 2008, 04:25 |
i agree with " they are not al
|
#26 |
Senior Member
|
i agree with " they are not along the blades",and they do not normal to the blade too.
and also there is velocity in the hub and the shroud (which is up and down boundary of the impeller). what is wrong with it? wayne |
|
April 3, 2008, 04:27 |
and also there is velocity in
|
#27 |
Senior Member
|
and also there is velocity in the hub and the shroud (which is up and down boundary of the impeller)
---> and also there is no velocity in the hub and the shroud (which is up and down boundary of the impeller) sorry. |
|
April 3, 2008, 05:27 |
and look at next two picture (
|
#28 |
Senior Member
|
and look at next two picture (1 is foam ,2 is CFX)
1 2 you can find in foam calculation before the flow goes in to the blade it does not rotate,which is quiet differet from CFX result. it also happened in the inlet boundary so i guess it may be because of the faceSet or boundary condition,i am not quiet sure. what is your idea? wayne |
|
April 3, 2008, 05:30 |
foam
http://www.cfd-online.co
|
#29 |
Senior Member
|
foam
|
|
April 3, 2008, 05:32 |
cfx
http://www.cfd-online.com
|
#30 |
Senior Member
|
cfx
|
|
April 3, 2008, 05:57 |
I still think the impeller in
|
#31 | |
Senior Member
Dragos
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 648
Rep Power: 20 |
I still think the impeller in foam computation spins in opposite direction to the one in cfx.
foam: +0z cfx: -0z Quote:
Dragos |
||
April 3, 2008, 10:32 |
Hi
I still think the impelle
|
#32 | ||
Senior Member
|
Hi
Quote:
so any other reasons? _________________________________________________ Quote:
|
|||
April 3, 2008, 10:41 |
by last, i mean in cfx result,
|
#33 |
Senior Member
|
by last, i mean in cfx result, there is a rotation around the axia in evidence,the rotation direction is the same as i have imposed,but there is no rotation in Foam result.
i think it will a rotation of opposite diretion if i have spined a oppsite one wayne |
|
April 3, 2008, 10:42 |
Can you display the MRFZones d
|
#34 |
Senior Member
Dragos
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 648
Rep Power: 20 |
Can you display the MRFZones dictionary here?
|
|
April 3, 2008, 13:31 |
Hi
i am not working with my c
|
#35 |
Senior Member
|
Hi
i am not working with my computer now.and i remember the omega is defined as [0 0 -1] 75.88 (impeller`s rotation speed is 725rpm, direction in -z).you could look at the "cfx" image carefully.at the right corner,z is to the inner,and the vector arround the inlet is clockwise.and angular velocity is in the -z. wayne |
|
April 4, 2008, 07:15 |
This is why I want to see your
|
#36 |
Senior Member
Dragos
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 648
Rep Power: 20 |
This is why I want to see your dictionary, because my impression is that you have a rotation axis defined as
axis axis [0 0 0 0 0 0 0] (0 0 1);in foam. So please post it when you will be able to. |
|
April 6, 2008, 22:26 |
Hi
i am sorry for i am aw
|
#37 |
Senior Member
|
Hi
i am sorry for i am away for the passed few days. and now i am back to my office. i have check for that right now,and you are right, i gave a wrong rotation axis dirction.i will modified it. by how to impose the rotation to the boundary? do i need a faceSet?or others? |
|
April 7, 2008, 01:47 |
No you don't have to impose th
|
#38 |
Senior Member
Dragos
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 648
Rep Power: 20 |
No you don't have to impose the velocity on the rotating wall. You just specify a normal wall "fixedValue" condition. If it is inside the rotating zone, then it will now how to impose the velocity correctly.
I'm glad you found the error, Dragos |
|
April 7, 2008, 03:06 |
Hi
how to impose?
i try to m
|
#39 |
Senior Member
|
Hi
how to impose? i try to make a faceset like: name IMPELLLER;//name of the cellzone action new; topoSetSources ( boundaryToFace { } ); and then modify the MRFZones Dictionary as: 5 //number of my rotating boundary.. ( IMPELLER //my cellZone { patches (HUB);//HUB is one of the rotating zone origin origin [0 1 0 0 0 0 0] (0 0 0); axis axis [0 0 0 0 0 0 0] (0 0 -1); omega omega [0 0 -1 0 0 0 0] 75.92; } ....//other rotating boundary such as shroud blade and so on ) and specify all normal wall "fixedValue" is that right? wayne |
|
April 7, 2008, 03:21 |
and here is the vector of U on
|
#40 |
Senior Member
|
and here is the vector of U on "HUB" whichi is rotating
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Centrifugal force/ Rotating Wall | david | FLUENT | 4 | January 2, 2014 06:30 |
centrifugal force | sue | FLUENT | 0 | November 25, 2008 03:01 |
cyclone separator- centrifugal force | kumar | FLUENT | 2 | May 29, 2008 03:33 |
Cyclone separator-centrifugal force | aPpA | FLUENT | 0 | July 6, 2005 14:22 |
Coriolis force | Saturn | FLUENT | 5 | September 30, 2004 15:56 |