|
[Sponsors] |
October 10, 2006, 07:32 |
I tried running the forward st
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I tried running the forward step case using both sonicFoam(laminar compressible solver) and rhoSonicFoam( turbulent compressible solver) and got a very different looking detached shock ahead of the step. The shock for the latter solver is much more vertical. Is there any literature to compare these results to? Also why isn't there a turbulence model dictionary for rhoSonicFoam?
Shuo |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
RhoTurbFoam sonicFoam rhoSonicFoam | mwibmer | OpenFOAM Bugs | 2 | September 1, 2008 04:28 |
BC implementation in rhoSonicFoam | srinath | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 2 | July 12, 2008 09:02 |
RhoSonicFoam errors | srinath | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 0 | June 3, 2008 07:06 |
RhoSonicFoam | srinath | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 0 | May 30, 2008 01:21 |
RhoSonicFoam | shuo | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 1 | October 9, 2006 19:57 |