|
[Sponsors] |
August 29, 2006, 22:02 |
I have a case of about 1M cell
|
#1 |
Senior Member
Xiaofeng Liu
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: State College, PA, USA
Posts: 118
Rep Power: 17 |
I have a case of about 1M cells. I run it parallel on 32 partitions (16nodes X 2cores = 32).
I want to simulate a process which takes about 1800s in reality. I run the case on the supercomputer for 12hours. It only simulates about 600s. One thing I noticed is the time information in the log file: at time step n: ExecutionTime = 25185.6 s ClockTime = 43755 s at time step n+1: ExecutionTime = 25194.1 s ClockTime = 43769 s The clocktime is almost twice that of execution time. Does execution time means CPU time and clocktime means CPU time plus communication time between nodes? Does it mean the program spent a lot of time just on waiting for data transfer?
__________________
Xiaofeng Liu, Ph.D., P.E., Assistant Professor Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Penn State University 223B Sackett Building University Park, PA 16802 Web: http://water.engr.psu.edu/liu/ |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
parallel performance | ivandipia | CFX | 6 | January 29, 2009 15:26 |
Performance of interFoam running in parallel | hsieh | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 8 | September 14, 2006 09:15 |
ANSYS CFX 10.0 Parallel Performance for Windows XP | Saturn | CFX | 4 | August 13, 2006 12:27 |
Parallel Performance of Fluent | Soheyl | FLUENT | 2 | October 30, 2005 06:11 |
Parallel performance | hsing | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 16 | August 30, 2005 14:38 |