CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM > OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD

Parallel "icoDyMFoam" (min(const UList<Type>&) / FieldFunctions.C / empty field)

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   May 8, 2009, 13:26
Default
  #21
New Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 29
Rep Power: 17
chapman is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by olivier View Post
[...] Then the mixerGgiFvMesh was built on the mixer2D test case, it is a dynamicFvMesh build to solve a mixer case, so I guess a rotor and a stator radially set. [...]
If anybody knows whether mixerGgiFvMesh can be used to handle an axial turbine, please let me know.

@Olivier: Thanks again, you were a great help to me so far.
chapman is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 11, 2009, 09:03
Default Short update
  #22
New Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 29
Rep Power: 17
chapman is on a distinguished road
I have disovered that it works fine when using only one CPU.

Currently I am trying to find out whether it has to do with movingCells. The statement "Number of moving cells in the moving region" shows the wrong number of cells when using multiple CPUs.
chapman is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 25, 2009, 11:31
Default
  #23
Member
 
lord_kossity's Avatar
 
Andreas Dietz
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Munich
Posts: 79
Rep Power: 17
lord_kossity is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by chapman View Post
Hi Olivier,

my origin is located in the rotor region.

Speaking of the other keywords:
The keyword axis is self-explaining, but what about direction ?

Andy
If your mesh turns in the wrong direction just give your rpm value in constant/dynamicMeshDict a negative signum.

Last edited by lord_kossity; November 25, 2009 at 12:01. Reason: Attachement of images
lord_kossity is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 4, 2010, 04:29
Default Did you resolved your problem?
  #24
Member
 
Aldo Iannetti
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 48
Rep Power: 16
aldo.iannetti is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by chapman View Post
Hello everyone,

in the meantime icoDyMFoam works very well even without Louis' trick.

However, I am facing another problem at the moment. I would like to connect a stator mesh and a rotor mesh using a SlidingInterface. Unfortunately, not only the rotor mesh is moving


My dynamicMeshDict looks like this:

Code:
 
dynamicFvMeshLib  "libtopoChangerFvMesh.so";
dynamicFvMesh      mixerGgiFvMesh;
 
mixerGgiFvMeshCoeffs
{
    coordinateSystem
    {
        type            cylindrical;
        origin          (1.7 0 0);
        axis            (0 0 1);
        direction      (1 0 0);
    }
 
    rpm             60;
 
    slider
    {
        moving    ( rotor_inlet );
        static      ( stator_outlet );
    }
}
Is it necessary to put also the other rotor patches (like rotor_casing, rotor_hub, etc.) in "moving"?

Hi,
IDid you resolve your problem? I think I have the same problem with turbDyMFoam, I have the stator volume rotating together with the rotor volume.
Thanks
Aldo
aldo.iannetti is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
icodymfoam, mixerggifvmesh, parallel


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Moving mesh Niklas Wikstrom (Wikstrom) OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 122 June 15, 2014 06:20
Differences between serial and parallel runs carsten OpenFOAM Bugs 11 September 12, 2008 11:16
Problem with rhoSimpleFoam matteo_gautero OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 0 February 28, 2008 06:51
IcoFoam parallel woes msrinath80 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 9 July 22, 2007 02:58
Parallel FOAM FATAL IO ERROR msrinath80 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 1 July 28, 2006 12:48


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 17:27.