|
[Sponsors] |
Why results differs between upwind and vanLeerV |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
July 23, 2009, 05:58 |
Why results differs between upwind and vanLeerV
|
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Norway
Posts: 138
Rep Power: 17 |
Dear community,
I have been experimenting with different schemes for a pipe case, and have been running upwind and vanLeerV for the initial phase for two almost identical cases. A two phase flow w/ alpha = 0.5 with different velocities is used. In setup 1 I used this setup for div schemes: divSchemes... and for setup 2: divSchemesBut the results from the two setups are quite different, and I believe the only difference in my setup is the different schemes. After 10 seconds, the pipe exit looks very different in the two setups - see attached photos. And it is the vanLeer-case which is "delayed". Does anybody have an explanation to this? I suppose the two schemes should yield the same results? |
|
November 10, 2012, 05:55 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Claus Meister
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Wiesbaden, Germany
Posts: 241
Rep Power: 18 |
Hallo kjetil,
the difference between upwind and vanLeer is, that vanLeer is a scheme composed of upwind and central differencing. Of course, you can have different results, because upwind is alway first order accurate whereby vanLeer can have second order accuracy - when no step gradients occur. For a better understanding, I recommend to read Versteeg (Chapter about upwind, QUCIK etc.). He does a very good analysis about the different schemes. Cheers |
|
Tags |
difference, scheme, upwind, vanleer |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|