CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM > OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD

Inviscid Supersonic Flow Simulation

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   July 27, 2009, 00:04
Default Inviscid Supersonic Flow Simulation
  #1
New Member
 
Alan Harrland
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 21
Rep Power: 17
Alan is on a distinguished road
Hi everyone.

I am currently undertaking a Phd in hypersonics, and I am required to perform some supersonic CFD simulations in OpenFOAM. I am quite new to this, so I have a few (and I am sure I will have plenty more) questions.

Initially I am simulating a wedge in a supersonic flow. I have based my initial model on the wedge15Ma5 tutorial case in rhopSonicFoam.

My first question is when playing around with the wedge tutorial, if I increase the Mach number the solution rapidly diverges (courant number increases exponentially until the solver crashes). I altered the mach number in the 0/U file (changed it from 5 to 10, and also tried other values in between this range). Any ideas why this is happening?

My second question is what are the differences between rhoSonicFoam and rhopSonicFoam? I know that rhop is density pressure solver, but what does this mean? Am I using the right solvers in this case? What are their limitations etc?

If anyone could point me in the right direction as to where I could find this information, that would be great. Thanks,
Alan.
Alan is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 27, 2009, 04:08
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Alberto Passalacqua
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Ames, Iowa, United States
Posts: 1,912
Rep Power: 36
alberto will become famous soon enoughalberto will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan View Post
Hi everyone.

I am currently undertaking a Phd in hypersonics, and I am required to perform some supersonic CFD simulations in OpenFOAM. I am quite new to this, so I have a few (and I am sure I will have plenty more) questions.

Initially I am simulating a wedge in a supersonic flow. I have based my initial model on the wedge15Ma5 tutorial case in rhopSonicFoam.

My first question is when playing around with the wedge tutorial, if I increase the Mach number the solution rapidly diverges (courant number increases exponentially until the solver crashes). I altered the mach number in the 0/U file (changed it from 5 to 10, and also tried other values in between this range). Any ideas why this is happening?
I run the tutorial case with U set to 10, and turning the adaptive time stepping on, with max dt = 10^-4s. It did not diverge.

Did you reduce the time step or enable the automatic time stepping to respect the CFL condition? I run it with Co = 1. However for better results stay under 0.5.

Quote:
My second question is what are the differences between rhoSonicFoam and rhopSonicFoam? I know that rhop is density pressure solver, but what does this mean? Am I using the right solvers in this case? What are their limitations etc?
Take a look at the codes, you'll notice how the algorithms are implemented.

You might want to consider also rhoCentralFoam, which is based on a Riemann-free type of scheme developed by Turganov and Tadmor (the reference to the paper is in the code). I tried it on the same tutorial, and with the same changes I suggested above it runs OK.

Quote:
If anyone could point me in the right direction as to where I could find this information, that would be great. Thanks,
Alan.
You're welcome! Good luck with your simulations.

Best,
__________________
Alberto Passalacqua

GeekoCFD - A free distribution based on openSUSE 64 bit with CFD tools, including OpenFOAM. Available as in both physical and virtual formats (current status: http://albertopassalacqua.com/?p=1541)
OpenQBMM - An open-source implementation of quadrature-based moment methods.

To obtain more accurate answers, please specify the version of OpenFOAM you are using.
alberto is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 27, 2009, 04:36
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Alan Harrland
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 21
Rep Power: 17
Alan is on a distinguished road
Thanks Alberto, I had tried adjusting the time step, but it still diverged. Now that I have put adaptive time step on, it doesn't diverge. Thanks again for that.

I'm having a bit of trouble with a mesh I am generating based on this tutorial. I am essentially trying to model a cone in a supersonic flow. My blockMeshDict file is:

Code:
/*--------------------------------*- C++ -*----------------------------------*\
| =========                 |                                                 |
| \\      /  F ield         | OpenFOAM: The Open Source CFD Toolbox           |
|  \\    /   O peration     | Version:  1.5                                   |
|   \\  /    A nd           | Web:      http://www.OpenFOAM.org               |
|    \\/     M anipulation  |                                                 |
\*---------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
FoamFile
{
    version     2.0;
    format      ascii;
    class       dictionary;
    object      blockMeshDict;
}

// * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * //

convertToMeters 1;
vertices        
(
   (0 0 -0.05)
   (1 0 -0.05)
   (1.5 0 -0.05)
   (3 0 -0.05)
   (1 0.85 -0.05)
   (1.5 0.85 -0.05)
   (1 1 -0.05)
   (1 1.15 -0.05)
   (1.5 1.15 -0.05)
   (0 2 -0.05)
   (1 2 -0.05)
   (1.5 2 -0.05)
   (3 2 -0.05)
   (3 0.85 -0.05)
   (3 1.15 -0.05)
   (0 0 0.05)
   (1 0 0.05)
   (1.5 0 0.05)
   (3 0 0.05)
   (1 0.85 0.05)
   (1.5 0.85 0.05)
   (1 1 0.05)
   (1 1.15 0.05)
   (1.5 1.15 0.05)
   (0 2 0.05)
   (1 2 0.05)
   (1.5 2 0.05)
   (3 2 0.05)
   (3 0.85 0.05)
   (3 1.15 0.05)
);

blocks          
(
    hex (0 1 10 9 15 16 25 24)   (100 200 1) simpleGrading (1 1 1)
    hex (1 2 5 4 16 17 20 19)    (50 85 1) simpleGrading (1 1 1)
    prism (8 7 6 23 22 21)       (50 15 1) simpleGrading (1 1 1)
    prism (6 4 5 21 19 20)       (50 15 1) simpleGrading (1 1 1)
    hex (7 8 11 10 22 23 26 25)  (50 85 1) simpleGrading (1 1 1)
    hex (2 3 14 5 17 18 29 20)   (150 85 1) simpleGrading (1 1 1)
    hex (5 14 13 8 20 29 28 23)  (150 30 1) simpleGrading (1 1 1)
    hex (8 13 12 11 23 28 27 26) (150 85 1) simpleGrading (1 1 1)
);

edges           
(
);


patches         
(
    patch inlet 
    (
        (0 15 24 9)
    )

    patch outlet 
    (
        (3 18 29 14)
        (14 29 28 13)
        (13 28 27 12)
    )

    symmetryPlane bottom 
    (
        (0 1 16 15)
        (1 2 17 16)
        (2 3 18 17)
    )
    symmetryPlane top 
    (
        (9 10 25 24)
        (10 11 26 25)
    (11 12 27 26)
    )
    patch obstacle
    (
        (6 8 23 21)
        (6 21 20 5)
    (5 20 23 8)
    )
);

mergePatchPairs
(
);

// ************************************************************************* //
Which, when run, gives the following error:

Code:
inconsistent point locations between block pair 1 and 3 probably due to inconsistent grading.
I assume it is in the way I have defined the two prism blocks (blocks 2 and 3) that is not allowing the mesh to join properly, but I cant seem to figure out why it would be doing this. I also get a warning that there is a 'zero or negative pyramid volume: -0.0075 for face 1'

Any ideas as to what I am doing wrong

Thanks again very much for your help!
Alan is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Inviscid flow solver luca_g OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 3 August 11, 2024 11:52
Liquid Jet into Supersonic Flow Alex CFX 4 June 20, 2007 11:56
Unsteady simulation of flow past wheel Tom FLUENT 8 January 18, 2006 11:54
inviscid Sylvain FLUENT 6 October 30, 2005 14:58
flow simulation across a small fan jane luo Main CFD Forum 15 April 12, 2004 18:49


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 15:56.