|
[Sponsors] |
November 9, 2009, 02:15 |
|
#6 |
Senior Member
Dragos
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 648
Rep Power: 20 |
Hello .... dvdromnu (actually it would be nice to have a name here),
If the equations you're solving admit a solution, and if that solution is unique, then it doesn't matter what initial conditions you start with (as long as they are physical or representative for your equations). If you're interested in the steady state solution, then again it doesn't matter what approach you use (steady/unsteady). If the convection/diffusion equation has the same steady state solution as the diffusion only equation, then you will not see any "profile shift". The only difference would be in the choice of the solver, and the amount of computational time requested (shorter for steady state and longer for unsteady). I hope this was useful, Dragos |
|
Tags |
initial conditions, unsteady |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Boundary conditions Cmesh high AOA | pcasto | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 3 | February 5, 2009 06:04 |
Outlet conditions in BuoyantFoam | jont | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 2 | October 15, 2007 07:55 |
Problems considering boundary conditions | Morten Andersen | CFX | 1 | January 18, 2007 09:04 |
Problems turbFoam | harwin | OpenFOAM Pre-Processing | 6 | December 7, 2006 05:36 |
compressible boundary conditions | vivian | Main CFD Forum | 8 | April 24, 2006 06:23 |