|
[Sponsors] |
Difficulties with validation - laminar plate flow |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
March 25, 2015, 05:12 |
Difficulties with validation - laminar plate flow
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 24
Rep Power: 14 |
Hello,
I'm trying to validate my calculations with a simple example from VDI Heat Atlas, please find the attached case. I want to make sure that I can produce reasonable results before going any further. Unfortunately I get about 30% error - and all measures to reduce it failed. This is why I'm asking for help now. Theory: The case is a 1D plate in laminar flow. Theory from VDI Heat Atlas (2013) says: Nusselt_x = 0,332*sqrt(Re_x)*Pr^(1/3) with the local Reynolds Number Re_x = w * x /nu with x being the distance over the plate. In my example, the fluid is water with Prandtl = 7, beta = 2e-4, nu = 1e-6, mu = 1e-3, rho = 1000, cp = 4185 When I run my case, htc is about 30% too high. The solver is buoyantBoussinesqSimpleFoam. Turbulent Prandtl Number is without influence (laminar flow), turbulence models are turned off. I changed many parameters, the only influence I could found is the laminar Prandtl number. To my best knowledge, the laminar Prandtl number in transportProperties is the same "normal" Prandtl number as in thermophysicalProperties - which is a fluid property. Reducing it to a value of 3.5 corrects my results but seems very wrong. On the other hand, I am wondering, why Prandtl number is double-defined. Any help is very welcome! Thank you. Edit: Sorry, case file was too large - deleted mesh files. Please execute blockMesh ... |
|
March 26, 2015, 09:39 |
|
#2 |
New Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 24
Rep Power: 14 |
Nobody interested?
I checked the wallHeatFlux utility by calculating snGrad(T) and using thermal conductivity of water as well as T_wall and T_inlet. I could approximately verify the values by the utility .. which are still about 30% too high compared to the VDI equations. Since I've checked everything else (even tried other solvers for the pressure field) I absolutely don't know ... Any good ideas? |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
CFX Treatment of Laminar and Turbulent Flows | Jade M | CFX | 18 | September 15, 2022 07:08 |
compressible laminar flow over flat plate | varunjain89 | Main CFD Forum | 19 | April 18, 2019 06:07 |
laminar flow over a flat plate blasius comparison | preetam69 | FLUENT | 0 | September 23, 2013 21:33 |
i dont understand: grid validation - laminar flow | Diegoesteban | FLUENT | 6 | August 19, 2013 17:08 |
perforated plate, flow direction | Benfa | CFX | 10 | August 2, 2013 07:33 |