
[Sponsors] 
Relation between k and UPrime2Mean etc in LES 

LinkBack  Thread Tools  Search this Thread  Display Modes 
May 15, 2011, 02:51 
Relation between k and UPrime2Mean etc in LES

#1 
Senior Member
Tarak
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: State College, PA
Posts: 111
Rep Power: 16 
Hii,
While doing LES using OF, I found that the value of k and the value of 0.5*(UPrime2Meanxx+UPrime2Meanyy+UPrime2Meanzz) are very different. Can someone please elaborate why is it so? They are supposed to be exactly the same, according to the definition of turbulent kinetic energy. Thanks, Tarak 

May 16, 2011, 08:18 

#2 
Member
David Aljure
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: CTTC Universidad Politécnica de Catalunya. Spain
Posts: 38
Rep Power: 15 
I think the difference is that the k calculated in LES refers to the subgridscale kinetic energy, whereas the 0.5*(u'_ii) refers to the total turbulent kinetic energy


May 16, 2011, 11:10 

#3 
Senior Member
Tarak
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: State College, PA
Posts: 111
Rep Power: 16 
Hii,
Thanks for the reply. But while prescribing the boundary value in k, suppose say at inlet, we set the value of the TKE from k=1.5(I*U)^2. That's not sgs kinetic energy. So doesn't these 2 contradict each other? Thanks, Tarak 

May 16, 2011, 12:39 

#4 
Member
David Aljure
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: CTTC Universidad Politécnica de Catalunya. Spain
Posts: 38
Rep Power: 15 
I'm not sure of that boundary value for k, however, if you take a look at the source codes of the LES models you'll see how the k is calculated.
When using oneEqEddy models the subgrid kinetic energy is calculated through a transport equation and then used to calculate the subgrid viscocity. In smagorinsky models the subgrid kinetic energy is calculated from the velocity gradient. In LES modeling the SGS quantities are used to close the model. The value of k is an instantaneus value, different from the total turbulent kinetic energy calculated from the Reynolds stress tensor 

May 16, 2011, 12:42 

#5 
Senior Member
Tarak
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: State College, PA
Posts: 111
Rep Power: 16 
Thanks a lot. Ya I'm sure that the k is indeed sgs k, but then it becomes difficult to prescribe the inlet condition, as the sgs ke is not known beforehand. So, is it wise to prescribe a relatively low value of k, that is lower than the total turb kinetic energy? I you have some personal experience with this, please do not hesitate to advice.
Thanks, Tarak 

May 16, 2011, 12:51 

#6 
Member
David Aljure
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: CTTC Universidad Politécnica de Catalunya. Spain
Posts: 38
Rep Power: 15 
For the problem I'm solving now i'm using a turbulent inlet velocity profile, and for k i'm setting a low value, 2e5. I'm getting accepable results with this. You should be worried for this condition if using oneEqEddy or kOmega type models, smagorinsky models do not depend on k as it is calculated from the velocity


May 16, 2011, 12:54 

#7 
Senior Member
Tarak
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: State College, PA
Posts: 111
Rep Power: 16 
Thanks a lot.
I am using dynamicOneeqEddy model, that's why I am so concerned about it. I am presently simulating the flow over a circular cylinder for Re=3900, but not managing to get an acceptable recirculation length. So, the way you prescribed now may help. If you had any luck with the flow over a circular cylider please do let me know. Thanks, Tarak 

May 17, 2011, 03:43 

#8 
Member
Gregor Olenik
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: http://greole.github.io/
Posts: 89
Rep Power: 17 
k is indeed the turbulent sgs energy (see http://foam.sourceforge.net/doc/Doxy...OneEqEddy.html), but UPrime2Meanxx are the variances of the resolved and time averaged scales http://foam.sourceforge.net/doc/Doxy...0b4d6940d1b9e4.
So your 0.5*tr(UPrime2Mean) is more like kinetic energy of the resolved turbulent scales. Last edited by gregor; May 17, 2011 at 04:01. 

January 20, 2012, 20:08 

#9 
Member
pooyan
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 62
Rep Power: 14 
Hi gregor
I am trying to find out how Uprime2Mean is calculated. I went to the source code of fieldaveraging, but still I could not figure out how this parameter is calculated. I am looking for a Reynolds stress definition as below R=<u'iu'j>+<uiuj><ui><uj> the first trem is unresolved Reynolds stress and the addition of the other two terms are the resolved Reynolds Stress. Is Uprime2Mean the same as above equation? any comment on the Uprime2Mean calculation will be of great help to me. Thanks 

January 24, 2012, 08:16 

#10 
Member
Gregor Olenik
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: http://greole.github.io/
Posts: 89
Rep Power: 17 
Uprime2Mean is simply the variance of the resolved scales. Which is the quadratic value of the standard deviation sigma. Standard deviation gives you an idea on how much your values deviate around a mean value.
var = sigma^2 = 1/(N) sum^N(phi  <phi>)^2, where <.> is a time averaged value So it is the averaged deviation around a mean value . The definition of Reynoldstresses has nothing to do with how the variances a calculated. Gregor 

January 24, 2012, 12:30 

#11 
Member
pooyan
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 62
Rep Power: 14 
Thanks Gregor
Now, I have an idea on how Uprime2Mean is claculated. I want to get the time average of Reynolds stress tensor during the run. In Kepsilon Model, R is calculated like this tmp<volSymmTensorField> kEpsilon::R() const { return tmp<volSymmTensorField> ( new volSymmTensorField ( IOobject ( "R", runTime_.timeName(), mesh_, IOobject::NO_READ, IOobject::NO_WRITE ), ((2.0/3.0)*I)*k_  nut_*twoSymm(fvc::grad(U_)), k_.boundaryField().types() ) ); } Do you have any idea how I can implement this in OpenFoam? 

January 24, 2012, 12:43 

#12  
Member
Gregor Olenik
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: http://greole.github.io/
Posts: 89
Rep Power: 17 
Quote:
Code:
functions { fieldAverage1 { type fieldAverage; functionObjectLibs ( "libfieldFunctionObjects.so" ); enabled true; resetOnOutput false; cleanRestart true; outputControl outputTime; fields ( R { mean on; prime2Mean off; base time; } ); } } 

January 24, 2012, 13:20 

#13 
Member
pooyan
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 62
Rep Power: 14 
I have already done that. But it gives me the following error
Requested Field R Does not exist in the database 

January 25, 2012, 03:18 

#14 
Member
Gregor Olenik
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: http://greole.github.io/
Posts: 89
Rep Power: 17 
Are you doing LES or RANS and what is your turbulence model ?


January 25, 2012, 04:31 

#15 
Member
Dejan Morar
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 78
Rep Power: 16 
Hi,
I think that every field you want to average first has to be created here: #include "createFields.H" in your solver. So, go to solver you want to use, and add a new field in createField.H: something like: volSymmTensorField R_ ... ... Than, you'll have to add something like this into solver: R_ = yourTurbulenceModel>R(); And than, field R_ can be averaged... You'll have to play a little with solver, but this is not a big issue... Regards, Dejan 

January 25, 2012, 04:43 

#16  
Member
Gregor Olenik
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: http://greole.github.io/
Posts: 89
Rep Power: 17 
Quote:
It doesn't matter where you create it, as long as it is registred in the object registry. Depending on if he is doing RANS or LES it could be yourTurbulenceModel>B() (for LES) aswell Gregor 

January 25, 2012, 04:51 

#17 
Member
Dejan Morar
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 78
Rep Power: 16 
Ufff, sorry, my mistake. It's LES about (from the first post).
So, it's definitely: yourTurbulenceModel>B() (for LES) 

January 25, 2012, 04:56 

#18 
Member
Gregor Olenik
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: http://greole.github.io/
Posts: 89
Rep Power: 17 
Ok i just wondered, because its not the original guy asking anymore.
And if its LES then you have to create the field first (i.e. in #include createFields.H) and then assign it like B_ = yourLESturbMod>B(). I was just confused by his RANS example, where the R field gets created by default from the turbulence model. 

January 25, 2012, 11:43 

#19 
Member
pooyan
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 62
Rep Power: 14 
hi
I am using RANS and KEpsilon Model to solve my problem and the error still exists. I went through KEpsilon.C to find how R is calculated and saved. I see that in this file, k and epsilon are written in a file by using k_ ( IOobject ( "k", runTime_.timeName(), mesh_, IOobject::NO_READ, IOobject::AUTO_WRITE ), autoCreateK("k", mesh_) but for R, it is tmp<volSymmTensorField> kEpsilon::R() const { return tmp<volSymmTensorField> ( new volSymmTensorField ( IOobject ( "R", runTime_.timeName(), mesh_, IOobject::NO_READ, IOobject::NO_WRITE ), ((2.0/3.0)*I)*k_  nut_*twoSymm(fvc::grad(U_)), k_.boundaryField().types() ) ); } by Looking at the above file, I see that R is created but it is not written anywhere. I changed NO_WRITE to AUTO_WRITE, but nothing happened. Do you still believe that R is created and can be averaged?! Thanks for your time. I do appreciate your help 

January 25, 2012, 11:54 

#20 
Member
Gregor Olenik
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: http://greole.github.io/
Posts: 89
Rep Power: 17 
Ok i guess the reason is that you R field is only created as a tmp field if you are calling the R() function. So you should try what morad suggested and create a separate R field inside your createFields.H
as Code:
volSymmTensorField R_ ( IOobject ( "R", runTime_.timeName(), mesh_, IOobject::NO_READ, IOobject::NO_WRITE // you could use auto_write aswell ), turbulence>R() // don't know if that works ? ) and make sure that you update it every time step by R_ = turbulence>R() Gregor 

Thread Tools  Search this Thread 
Display Modes  


Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Problems sampling UPrime2Mean  leonardo.morita  OpenFOAM PostProcessing  5  May 10, 2012 04:36 
Bug in Dynamic 1Eq Eddy Viscosity LES Model Incompressible flow  harishg  OpenFOAM Bugs  5  December 2, 2008 18:18 