CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM > OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD

SpalartAllmaras wall function in OpenFOAM 2.0.1

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   August 31, 2011, 11:03
Default SpalartAllmaras wall function in OpenFOAM 2.0.1
New Member
Richard Moser
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 28
Rep Power: 16
moser_r is on a distinguished road
I have just installed OpenFOAM 2.0.1, and have tried re-running some benchmark test cases which I had done for version 1.7.1. However, they crash, stating that there is an unknown patchField type (nutSpalartAllmarasWallFunction). The nutSpalartAllmarasWallFunction is not used as a patch type in any of the new tutorial cases (where it was before, at least for some of them), and seems to have been replaced by nutUSpaldingWallFunction.

So, has the Spalart Allmaras wall function gone in 2.0.1, or has it just been renamed? In either case: why, oh why? Compatibility out of the window ...
moser_r is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 1, 2011, 11:40
New Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 16
mjb28 is on a distinguished road
Hi Richard, have you confirmed if the Spalart Amaras wall function has been removed or renamed in OpenFoam 2.0.1? I have the same problem as you where the wall function is not recognised as it was before.
mjb28 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 9, 2011, 04:05
Laurens Van Dyck
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Netherlands/Germany
Posts: 34
Rep Power: 14
laurensvd is on a distinguished road
I believe it is now called nutUSpaldingWallFunction
laurensvd is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 14, 2013, 12:25
Senior Member
saeideh mohamadi
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 229
Rep Power: 14
s.m is on a distinguished road
Originally Posted by laurensvd View Post
I believe it is now called nutUSpaldingWallFunction
if we use nutUSpaldinWallFunction for spalarallmaras, then the y+ doesn't need to be <5 (y+<5 for SA)?
or inspite of using this wallFunction the y+ should lower than 5?
Thank you
s.m is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 18, 2013, 17:37
New Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 12
ghtunmun is on a distinguished road
Hello everybody!
Well I'm a newbie here and I'm simulating a flow over a wheel with a 2.1.x version. I used the k-Omega SST model with the nutkWallfunction and I had yplus Values that are between 30 and 100. I also had good Drag and Lift coefficients.
Now coming to the Spallart Allmaras model I tried the same simulation with the same mesh using the nutUSpaldinWallFunction and I'm having very near results concerning lift and drag to those of k-Omega SST (though my yPlus values are not less than 5). I'm a little bit confused about the relation between the nutUSpaldinWallFunction and the necessary yPlus values for SA in Openfoam.
Shall I keep the same function if I want to work with the same mesh? Or are there other wallfunctions (with yPlus values between 30 and 100) that work with the currently implemented version of Spalart Allmaras (In other words is it possible to use SA in Openfoam as a high-Re model ? and if so which wallfunction should I use?)
I would be grateful if someone here can help me!
Best regards
ghtunmun is offline   Reply With Quote


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Wall function for velocity? johnblund OpenFOAM 3 September 6, 2022 07:22
ParaView for OF-1.6-ext Chrisi1984 OpenFOAM Installation 0 December 31, 2010 06:42
Temperature wall function for incompressible solver Hagen OpenFOAM 0 December 27, 2010 09:25
DecomposePar links against liblamso0 with OpenMPI jens_klostermann OpenFOAM Bugs 11 June 28, 2007 17:51
Wall function in adverse pressure gradients stephane baralon Main CFD Forum 11 September 2, 1999 04:05

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 13:40.