|
[Sponsors] |
Numerical errors in nested domain with pre-calculated boundary values |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
April 4, 2012, 10:18 |
|
#3 |
Senior Member
Niels Gjoel Jacobsen
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 1,900
Rep Power: 37 |
Hi Arne
I have two possible explanations, which depends slightly on the details, and you will be able to check the correctness using a laminar solution: 1. If you are using U from the large to the small domain: In that case you are using a velocity field, which does not conserve mass! On collocated grids as in OpenFoam, mass conservation is enforced through the face fluxes, so if you prescribe a boundary value all the way around for U, then mass conservation fails. 2. If you are using face fluxes between the two grids: In that case you might have forgotten to take the direction of the normal vectors into account, i.e. you are not conserving mass. Furthermore, if you are also pre-scribing values for the pressure on the boundaries, then you have an extremely stiff system, hence I would suggest pressure dirichlet when the flux is outward and neumann when inward. Virsa virsa for the velocities. Hope it helps / Niels |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
CFX13 Post Periodic interface | EtaEta | CFX | 7 | December 8, 2011 17:15 |
Solver error message!!! | IoSa | CFX | 1 | September 14, 2006 04:48 |
New topic on same subject - Flow around race car | Tudor Miron | CFX | 15 | April 2, 2004 06:18 |
Boundary Conditions | Jan Ramboer | Main CFD Forum | 11 | August 16, 1999 08:59 |