
[Sponsors] 
laminar Flow over a sphere(laminar vs KOmegaSST simulation) 

LinkBack  Thread Tools  Search this Thread  Display Modes 
March 12, 2023, 01:50 
laminar Flow over a sphere(laminar vs KOmegaSST simulation)

#1 
Senior Member
Farzad Faraji
Join Date: Nov 2019
Posts: 205
Rep Power: 7 
Hello all
I am simulating flow over a sphere at Re = 881 where Drag coefficient must be almost Cd=0.5. I simulate it using both using laminar and Turbulent models(KOmegaSST). for laminar simulation, I get Cd ~0.5 but fort the Turbulent simulation, first of all it takes very long tome to converge and even after convergence, it gives Cd~0.65(Actually it has not fully converged yet, see attached figure). Now I have two questions; 1 what happens if I use turbulent model to simulate laminar flow? 2 when should I expect convergence based on the attached figure? Thanks, Farzad 

March 15, 2023, 22:01 
Sphere in Re881 with laminar and kOemgaSST(SimpleFoam)

#2 
Senior Member
Farzad Faraji
Join Date: Nov 2019
Posts: 205
Rep Power: 7 
I did test with laminar and kOmegaSST for sphere and airfoil and as I told earlier it predict higher drag Coefficient, but flow field visually seems correct. I repeat it with airfoil with angle of attack = 30 degree and not only drag coefficient is different, but also flow field is visually seems incorrect, why?
Also, I want to test below methods too, but they fail at the very beginning of the simulation; 1) SpalartAllmaras (fails at the beginning iterations), 2) kOmegaSSTLM (fails at the beginning iterations) , 3) kOmegaSSTSAS (Selecting LES delta type vanDriest Killed) Should I change my boundary conditions when I switch from kOmegaSST to other models? Thanks, Farzad 

March 20, 2023, 06:49 

#3  
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Cologne, Germany
Posts: 363
Rep Power: 8 
Quote:
2. for convergence you should always monitor the value of interest, in your case the drag coefficient. if it does not change or only oscillates between two stable extremes, you can say that based on your case setup that value is your solution. 

March 20, 2023, 07:00 

#4  
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Cologne, Germany
Posts: 363
Rep Power: 8 
Quote:
i think to predict good pressure distribution for forces around bodies you want to resolve the wall boundary layer, check your BC for your chosen turbuluence model if it supports boundary resolution. if you have problems with convergence, first start your simulation with first order upwind schemes for advection terms: div(phi,u), div(phi,k) etc. you can also use higher viscosity values. after that try using lower viscosity with the previous converged solution. after that switch your div(phi,u) to second order upwind, and not change turbulence schemes. once converged change your schemes for turbulence to second order scheme also. try this step by step approach, do not rush to find a perfect solution right from your first try. 

Tags 
komegasst, laminar, openfaom, sphere 
Thread Tools  Search this Thread 
Display Modes  


Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Laminar flow and wall roughness  junbbung  FLUENT  2  November 26, 2022 21:22 
SU2 NACA0012 Transitional flow simulation Convergence Issues  morgJ  SU2  0  July 21, 2022 07:42 
Different peak velocity for laminar and turbulent models of Reynolds Number500 flow  vronti  Main CFD Forum  2  July 12, 2022 10:36 
unable to run dynamic mesh(6dof) and wave UDF  shedo  Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming  0  July 1, 2022 17:22 
High velocity in Laminar flow  Manojmech  FLUENT  0  November 3, 2016 04:37 