value uniform 1/0 meaning for contact angle boundary condition?

Saideep · May 20, 2015, 12:31

Hi Foamers;

I have a rather basic question. I am dealing with two phase flows using the interFOAM solver. I try to implement the boundary condition for the contact angle at the top and bottom layers of my rectangular domain.

I use the following boundary condition:
top {
type constantAlphaContactAngle;
limit gradient;
theta0 0;
value uniform 1;
}

I am curious to know what does the value uniform 1 mean in this case? I even changed the value to uniform 0 and I have the same set of results.

I would be happy if anyone could clarify this.

Thanks.

Saideep · May 20, 2015, 13:39

Sorry guys;

it was so easy!! The value over there is for the contact angle. 0 - 180 are valid. 0 is not considering any contact angle effects and any value of alpha depends on the condition for your run.

Could be useful for any others. Sorry to bother you!!

DanieleC · March 6, 2019, 05:57

Dear Saideep

If I understand well, putting theta0=45 and " value uniform 0" I will have a contact angle of 0. Instead, by setting "value uniform 1" I will have a contact angle of 45. That right?

May 20, 2015, 12:31	value uniform 1/0 meaning for contact angle boundary condition?	#1
Saideep Senior Member Saideep Join Date: Apr 2015 Location: INDIA Posts: 203 Rep Power: 12	Hi Foamers; I have a rather basic question. I am dealing with two phase flows using the interFOAM solver. I try to implement the boundary condition for the contact angle at the top and bottom layers of my rectangular domain. I use the following boundary condition: top { type constantAlphaContactAngle; limit gradient; theta0 0; value uniform 1; } I am curious to know what does the value uniform 1 mean in this case? I even changed the value to uniform 0 and I have the same set of results. I would be happy if anyone could clarify this. Thanks.

May 20, 2015, 13:39	value is the fixed angle of contact to the solid surface.	#2
Saideep Senior Member Saideep Join Date: Apr 2015 Location: INDIA Posts: 203 Rep Power: 12	Sorry guys; it was so easy!! The value over there is for the contact angle. 0 - 180 are valid. 0 is not considering any contact angle effects and any value of alpha depends on the condition for your run. Could be useful for any others. Sorry to bother you!!

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
mixed inflow/outflow downstream boundary condition question	peob	OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD	3	February 3, 2017 10:54
interFoam \| Hydraulic Jump \| Correct boundary condition p_rgh	pythag0ra5	OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD	17	September 5, 2014 04:31
External Radiation Boundary Condition (Two sided wall), Grid Interface	CFD XUE	FLUENT	0	July 8, 2010 06:49
Boundary condition setting for non-premixed combustion using reactingFoam	skyopener	OpenFOAM	0	May 23, 2010 22:55
vorticity boundary condition	bearcharge	Main CFD Forum	0	May 14, 2010 11:32

March 6, 2019, 05:57		#3
DanieleC New Member Daniele Catucci Join Date: Mar 2019 Posts: 5 Rep Power: 7	Dear Saideep If I understand well, putting theta0=45 and " value uniform 0" I will have a contact angle of 0. Instead, by setting "value uniform 1" I will have a contact angle of 45. That right?