CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM

No flames from PaSR combustion model

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   July 14, 2017, 06:00
Default No flames from PaSR combustion model
  #1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 372
Rep Power: 14
openfoammaofnepo is on a distinguished road
Hi All,

I tried to use PaSR to calculate a simple jet flame, firstly used infinitelyFastChemistry model to obtain an fully burning jet flame field, which seem reasonable. Then I changed the combustion model to PaSR, and if course changed other PaSR related parameter. When the simulation goes, the flame is convected downstream and finally it become just cold. What is the problem for the simulation? Anybody also has this experince?

I put my combustionProperties, chemistryProperties and reactions below:

Code:
combustionModel    PaSR<rhoChemistryCombustion>;
active  true;
infinitelyFastChemistryCoeffs
{
    semiImplicit    no;
    C               10;
}
laminarCoeffs
{
}
noCombustionCoeffs
{
}
PaSRCoeffs
{
    Cmix                1.0;
    turbulentReaction   yes;
//  useReactionRate     true;
}
Code:
chemistryType
{
    chemistrySolver   ode;  //EulerImplicit;
    chemistryThermo   rho;
}

chemistry           on;

initialChemicalTimeStep 1e-07;

EulerImplicitCoeffs
{
    cTauChem        1;
    equilibriumRateLimiter off;
}

odeCoeffs
{
    solver          Rosenbrock34;
    absTol          1e-12;
    relTol          0.01;
}
Code:
species
(
    CH4
    CO
    CO2
    H2
    H2O
    O2
    N2
);

reactions
{
//- for infinite fast reaction model
//  methaneReaction
//  {
//      type         irreversibleinfiniteReaction;
//      reaction      "CH4 + 2O2 + 7.5N2 = CO2 + 2H2O + 7.5N2";
//  }

//- for PaSR combustion model
    methaneReaction
    {
        type     irreversibleArrheniusReaction;
        reaction "CH4 + 2O2^1.0 = CO2 + 2H2O^1.0";
        A        7e+06;
        beta     0;
        Ta       10063.8;
    }
    hydrogenReaction
    {
        type     irreversibleArrheniusReaction;
        reaction "H2 + 0.5O2^1.0 = H2O";
        A        4.74342e+12;
        beta     0;
        Ta       10063.8;
    }
}
openfoammaofnepo is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 14, 2017, 07:02
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 372
Rep Power: 14
openfoammaofnepo is on a distinguished road
Problem solved. The activation energy is too small, so that the reaction is so weak.

Quote:
Originally Posted by openfoammaofnepo View Post
Hi All,

I tried to use PaSR to calculate a simple jet flame, firstly used infinitelyFastChemistry model to obtain an fully burning jet flame field, which seem reasonable. Then I changed the combustion model to PaSR, and if course changed other PaSR related parameter. When the simulation goes, the flame is convected downstream and finally it become just cold. What is the problem for the simulation? Anybody also has this experince?

I put my combustionProperties, chemistryProperties and reactions below:

Code:
combustionModel    PaSR<rhoChemistryCombustion>;
active  true;
infinitelyFastChemistryCoeffs
{
    semiImplicit    no;
    C               10;
}
laminarCoeffs
{
}
noCombustionCoeffs
{
}
PaSRCoeffs
{
    Cmix                1.0;
    turbulentReaction   yes;
//  useReactionRate     true;
}
Code:
chemistryType
{
    chemistrySolver   ode;  //EulerImplicit;
    chemistryThermo   rho;
}

chemistry           on;

initialChemicalTimeStep 1e-07;

EulerImplicitCoeffs
{
    cTauChem        1;
    equilibriumRateLimiter off;
}

odeCoeffs
{
    solver          Rosenbrock34;
    absTol          1e-12;
    relTol          0.01;
}
Code:
species
(
    CH4
    CO
    CO2
    H2
    H2O
    O2
    N2
);

reactions
{
//- for infinite fast reaction model
//  methaneReaction
//  {
//      type         irreversibleinfiniteReaction;
//      reaction      "CH4 + 2O2 + 7.5N2 = CO2 + 2H2O + 7.5N2";
//  }

//- for PaSR combustion model
    methaneReaction
    {
        type     irreversibleArrheniusReaction;
        reaction "CH4 + 2O2^1.0 = CO2 + 2H2O^1.0";
        A        7e+06;
        beta     0;
        Ta       10063.8;
    }
    hydrogenReaction
    {
        type     irreversibleArrheniusReaction;
        reaction "H2 + 0.5O2^1.0 = H2O";
        A        4.74342e+12;
        beta     0;
        Ta       10063.8;
    }
}
openfoammaofnepo is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 27, 2017, 02:50
Default PaSR
  #3
Member
 
Zhiheng Wang
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 72
Rep Power: 10
Zhiheng Wang is on a distinguished road
Use c= 0 to minimize the turbulent and laminar reaction time scale it must be low reynolds no case try c = in combustion PaSR directory.
Zhiheng Wang is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FireFoam - Which Combustion Model? Duy Le OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 3 May 10, 2021 04:43
Combustion model vs. chemistry model (thermo type) wenxu OpenFOAM 2 July 19, 2015 21:15
Diff in Combustion Modelling By Species Transport Model & Non-Premixed Combustion bhanuday.sharma FLUENT 0 June 23, 2015 02:50
Partially premixed combustion - model: less/ no temperature rise sanjeetlimbu Fluent Multiphase 5 April 21, 2015 20:13
combustion model Hennie van der Westhuizen Siemens 7 February 27, 2002 02:10


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 22:50.