Non equilibrium wall function : pressure acquisition problem

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 October 6, 2010, 18:52 Non equilibrium wall function : pressure acquisition problem #1 New Member   Mattia Maffioletti Join Date: Oct 2009 Posts: 1 Rep Power: 0 Hi everyone. I'm trying to implement a fluent-type wall function sensitized to pressure gradient, i.e. "non-equilibrium WF". There is no problem in epsilon/omega WF when I get the pressure gradient, needed for my calculation, in this way: const volScalarField& P = db().lookupObject("p"); volVectorField grdntP = fvc::grad(P); If I apply the same procedure in nutSpalartAllmarasWF ( that follows the general Spalding law-of-the-wall but it has to be sentivized to pressure gradient, too!) the solution explode in an unexplainable way. I've already tried to debug my code on every line that I added and I've concluded that the problematic line is the second I wrote before. My idea is that this procedure applied to nut-WF result in an unintentional modify of the pressure field, but I thin it's a weak idea, if I had understood OF works. Any idea?

October 10, 2010, 04:45
#2
Member

Maolong LIU
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 31
Rep Power: 16
Hi, have you solved this problem?
I am now also trying to write a new wall function including pressure gradient.

Quote:
 Originally Posted by MafioTia Hi everyone. I'm trying to implement a fluent-type wall function sensitized to pressure gradient, i.e. "non-equilibrium WF". There is no problem in epsilon/omega WF when I get the pressure gradient, needed for my calculation, in this way: const volScalarField& P = db().lookupObject("p"); volVectorField grdntP = fvc::grad(P); If I apply the same procedure in nutSpalartAllmarasWF ( that follows the general Spalding law-of-the-wall but it has to be sentivized to pressure gradient, too!) the solution explode in an unexplainable way. I've already tried to debug my code on every line that I added and I've concluded that the problematic line is the second I wrote before. My idea is that this procedure applied to nut-WF result in an unintentional modify of the pressure field, but I thin it's a weak idea, if I had understood OF works. Any idea?

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are Off Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post [Commercial meshers] Fluent3DMeshToFoam simvun OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 50 January 19, 2020 15:33 feng_w OpenFOAM Installation 1 January 25, 2009 06:59 jens_klostermann OpenFOAM Bugs 11 June 28, 2007 17:51 yu chun FLUENT 1 May 18, 2004 03:40 Luo FLUENT 24 April 11, 2000 06:07

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 15:47.