 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
[Sponsors] | ||||
Does MULES::implicitsolve allow for Courant numbers > 1? |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
May 31, 2011, 03:00
|
Does MULES::implicitsolve allow for Courant numbers > 1?
|
#1 |
|
New Member
Philip Simons
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 17  |
Hello,
although there are several threads concerning the time step size for MULES VOF (in interFoam and/or interDyMFoam) I have not found a definitive answer whether you (I/OpenFOAM) can safely increase the time step size, or that anyway the max Courant number should still remain < 1? thanks, Philip |
|
|
|
|
| Tags |
| courant number, implicit, mules |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1.7.x -> buoyantPimpleFoam -> hRhoThermo -> incompressible and icoPoly3ThermoPhysics? | will.logie | OpenFOAM Programming & Development | 1 | February 16, 2011 20:52 |
| CAD -> gMsh -> enGrid -> OpenFOAM Problem | AlGates | OpenFOAM | 7 | August 6, 2010 12:46 |
| IcoFoam parallel woes | msrinath80 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 9 | July 22, 2007 02:58 |
| HELP!! Prandtl numbers in RNG k-e turbulence model | maoasis | FLUENT | 0 | April 24, 2006 10:51 |
| Could anybody help me see this error and give help | liugx212 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 3 | January 4, 2006 18:07 |
1Likes
Threaded Mode
