|
[Sponsors] |
immersol -external radiation source set-up problem |
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
New Member
Aki
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
hi, I am trying to simulate a case where an XPS slab is receiving solar radiation and losing heat to the external environment (25oC) by radiation and convection and to the room through conduction and convection (25oC). I thought it would be pretty simple but turned out something I need help. The temperature is crazy high (249oC). Both the radiation flux and the convection flux is about 100 W, which is a lot less than my calculation based on the temperature computed.
The solar radiation is set as an internal source of the boundary cells at the edge of the wall. From the result file, the 200 W solar radiation was correctly executed. The boundary source was set as instructed by the Immersol instruction: PATCH(IMSW001,WWALL,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1) COVAL(IMSW001,T3,GRND4,GRND5) COVAL(IMSW001,TEM1,wallco,GRND5) The default values and coefficients were then modified SPEDAT(SET,EXTRN_TEMP,OF IMSW001,R,25) -----modify the external temperature to 25 oC SPEDAT(SET,EXTRN_CO1 ,OF IMSW001,R,4.536E-08) ---modify A=Sigma*E*Area SPEDAT(SET,EXTRN_CO2 ,OF IMSW001,R,5) ---modify B=Area*h SPEDAT(SET,EXTRN_PWR ,OF IMSW001,R,1) ----modify D=1 I was expecting the source would follow Q(W) = 5.67*10-8*ε*Area*(Te^4 – Tw^4) + Area*h*(Te - Tw) But the output source for T3 is 98 W and for the TEM1 is 98W as well. The wall temperature at the boundary reaches 250 oC. With this value and the above formula, I calculated the radiation would be 760 W and the convection would be 1125 W. Why is that? I think I must have understand the formula and the patch-coval wrong. But t I could not find any other documents on how they are to be used. BTW, the XPS is an 0.5*0.5*0.5m3 slab, but gridded as a 1-D problem. So the area above is 0.5*0.5m2. Any help or hint is very much appreciated. Thanks Aki |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
New Member
Dan Brown
Join Date: Nov 2021
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
For the calculation of the drag coefficient, the reference area will be the projected frontal area of the vehicle.
__________________
1v1 battle |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Member
michael malin
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: london
Posts: 33
Rep Power: 17 ![]() |
Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
GPU Linear Solvers for OpenFOAM | gocarts | OpenFOAM Announcements from Other Sources | 37 | August 17, 2022 15:22 |
[swak4Foam] funkyDoCalc with OF2.3 massflow | NiFl | OpenFOAM Community Contributions | 14 | November 25, 2020 04:30 |
SparceImage v1.7.x Issue on MAC OS X | rcarmi | OpenFOAM Installation | 4 | August 14, 2014 07:42 |
OpenFOAM without MPI | kokizzu | OpenFOAM Installation | 4 | May 26, 2014 10:17 |
OpenFOAM on MinGW crosscompiler hosted on Linux | allenzhao | OpenFOAM Installation | 127 | January 30, 2009 20:08 |