|
[Sponsors] |
July 15, 2014, 13:36 |
3D T-Rex Meshing
|
#1 |
New Member
ASV
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 |
Hi,
I am trying to create a mesh for a conjugate heat transfer study on a high pressure rotor blade. The geometry is 3D and is quite complex. I have managed to mesh all the fluid parts structured and now I am on to the solid domain. Due to the complexity, I am now trying to finish it using tetrahedrons. Pointwise has a T-Rex function which is very useful, (combines 5 cells to make a hexahedron) but I am having difficulty in trying to get it to work. It seems to stop a lot of cells from growing and therefore leaving many high angled pyramid cells (more than 10% over 175 degrees, this excludes all pyramid cells generated). I am willing to accept cells up to 175 degrees, but 179 degrees is certainly not right. My belief is that it is caused by the high aspect ratio structured cells within the boundary layer. However, I can't compromise on this due to the low y+ value required for the study. Does anybody have an experience with using T-Rex on Pointwise and willing to help me to rectify this issue. Ideally, one maximum full layer would suffice, but I am not getting any after many painstaking iterations. note. I am using a maximum angle of 175 under skew criteria as well as a collision buffer of 2. |
|
Tags |
conjugate heat transfer, hybrid, meshing, pointwise, t-rex |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Best Meshing scheme for Cylinder | Nutrex | Main CFD Forum | 4 | July 29, 2008 11:03 |
Meshing locks workbench window. | andy2o | CFX | 0 | February 1, 2008 05:01 |
Singularity of grid?Volume meshing vs face meshing | Ken | Main CFD Forum | 0 | September 4, 2003 11:09 |
Volume Meshing & Face Meshing? singularity of grid | ken | FLUENT | 0 | September 4, 2003 11:08 |