CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > REEF3D

Getting different results with different number of cores

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   August 10, 2023, 02:14
Default Getting different results with different number of cores
  #1
New Member
 
Keshav Pathak
Join Date: Jul 2022
Posts: 27
Rep Power: 3
keshav_20 is on a distinguished road
Hello REEF3D-team,
I used 20-cores and 8-cores to run the same simulation problem, it is generating different results. For instant, the drag load amplitude increases for 20-cores as compared to 8-cores, as shown in attached figure.
I am attaching the control and ctrl txt file as well.


Thank you

Regards
Keshav
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Drag-load-8cores-20cores.jpg (58.7 KB, 44 views)
Attached Files
File Type: txt control.txt (500 Bytes, 8 views)
File Type: txt ctrl.txt (204 Bytes, 9 views)
keshav_20 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 16, 2023, 05:39
Default
  #2
Super Moderator
 
Hans Bihs
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Trondheim, Norway
Posts: 377
Rep Power: 17
valgrinda is on a distinguished road
Thanks for the feedback! We are looking at this and will get back to you soon.
__________________
Hans Bihs
Team REEF3D
www.reef3d.com
valgrinda is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 27, 2023, 11:01
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Keshav Pathak
Join Date: Jul 2022
Posts: 27
Rep Power: 3
keshav_20 is on a distinguished road
Hello Team REEF3D
Any update in this regard?

Thank you

Regards
KP
keshav_20 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 2, 2023, 11:25
Default
  #4
Super Moderator
 
Hans Bihs
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Trondheim, Norway
Posts: 377
Rep Power: 17
valgrinda is on a distinguished road
We did some testing on this. In order to avoid the difference, could you try with G 3 1 - i.e. turn on direct forcing?
__________________
Hans Bihs
Team REEF3D
www.reef3d.com
valgrinda is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 3, 2023, 00:25
Default
  #5
Member
 
Bhargav
Join Date: Aug 2022
Posts: 30
Rep Power: 3
Varada is on a distinguished road
I tried to measure air pressure inside an oscillating water column as it interacts with waves in a 3D numerical wave tank.

First, I ran a simulation with 80 cores, and the results showed a very different profile as seen in the figure. Then, I ran the simulation again with just 8 cores, keeping everything else the same, and this time the results looked more reliable.

After reading your response on this page, I tried a different approach by using the solid forcing method instead of the immersed boundary method. However, I couldn't get any pressure data using this method, even though I kept all other settings unchanged.

I'm using REEF3D-23.03-release_candidate on an HPCE facility. Can you please take a look at the graph and input files I've attached and provide some suggestions?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Pressure_Time_series.JPG (52.0 KB, 10 views)
Attached Files
File Type: txt control.txt (277 Bytes, 0 views)
File Type: txt ctrl.txt (1.2 KB, 0 views)
Varada is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
use the message in macro DEFINE_PROFILE with parallel processor alireza_T Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming 3 May 11, 2022 02:08
Inconsistencies in reading .dat file during run time in new injection model Scram_1 OpenFOAM 0 March 23, 2018 22:29
[mesh manipulation] Importing Multiple Meshes thomasnwalshiii OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 18 December 19, 2015 18:57
[OpenFOAM.org] OF2.3.1 + OS13.2 - Trying to use the dummy Pstream library aylalisa OpenFOAM Installation 23 June 15, 2015 14:49
[blockMesh] --> foam fatal error: lillo763 OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 0 March 5, 2014 10:27


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 18:46.