|
[Sponsors] |
March 6, 2016, 09:47 |
Pseudo 2D mesh
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 11 |
Hi there! It's been a long time since my last post... I was then using fluent, and now I'm working as an intern and I have to fast learn Star-ccm+ to help my coworkers to do simulations ... They're pretty ambitius!
This time I want to do something that was easy in fluent & CFX. We want to make a 3D mesh, but use it for a 2D simulation. I mean, considering 3-axis, and the "depth" in the x-direction, the ZY plane should be refined, and have some nice inflation layers, but in the x-direction I want to have only one element (see screenshot mesh 3D & mesh ZY). In fact, the problem I see here is that having only 2 or 4 elements in that direction doesn't allow me to have good results. If you see the residuals plot, you can check that x-momentum never is below 0.1, I've set as a stopping criteria 1e-4 for every equation (should be OK for our purpose, but next step is to calculate Y+ to check accuracy). And it's kind of non-sense to have more than 1 element, it multiplies the total amount of elements and gives no information, as the boundaries in the x-direction are set to symmetry walls. I've also tried with slip-walls, but I have the same problem, residuals don't go lower than 1e-3 (screenshot residuals). The funny thing is only with 100 iterations (approx.) it gaves a good result (see screenshot velocity_106), and then at the 400th iteration weird things happens (screenshot velocity_1500)... So people, what am I doing wrong? Is it possible to have only one element in that direction? I've tried a volumetric control (with all the geometry inside it), and applied a trimmer, anisotropic meshing (taking care in the x-direction), but the minimum number of elements I get is 2. Some extra info: -This is a simple simulation involving a flat plate located vertically. The size is (x,y,z)=1, 0.1, 1 (meters). The "wind tunnel" is about (1, 20.1, 11). -The CD coefficient I want to get is about 1.9 (Frank White as reference). -Simulations are carried in star-ccm+ 9.02. Local parallel (4 processors). Thanks in advance! Sandra. |
|
Tags |
2d simulation, mesh, residuals, star-ccm+ |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
sliding mesh problem in CFX | Saima | CFX | 46 | September 11, 2021 07:38 |
Star CCM Overset Mesh Error (Rotating Turbine) | thezack | Siemens | 7 | October 12, 2016 11:14 |
[ICEM] surface mesh merging problem | everest | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 44 | April 14, 2016 06:41 |
[ICEM] Problem making structural mesh on a surface | froztbear | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 1 | November 10, 2011 08:52 |
[snappyHexMesh] snappyHexMesh won't work - zeros everywhere! | sc298 | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 2 | March 27, 2011 21:11 |