CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > Siemens > STAR-CCM+

Different conditions, same results

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By LuckyTran

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   March 24, 2022, 07:57
Question Different conditions, same results
  #1
New Member
 
Sam
Join Date: Mar 2022
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0
Seven277 is on a distinguished road
Hi all,

Just looking for a little guidance here, quite new to STAR CCM+ so please bear with. I have changed initial conditions (velocities) on my analysis of a 2004 F1 front wing, and it has given out the same results (drag and downforce plots) as it did at other velocities, this has been tried at 100, 150, 175 and 200mph, all returning the same figures, but the first iteration starts much higher as the speed increases, before coming down and giving out the same figures as the previous simulations.

Have I missed any settings or is there anything in particular that would cause this? I am also getting the same pressure, friction etc. readings no matter the speed I set the initial condition to in the physics sub section.

Thanks!
Seven277 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 24, 2022, 08:00
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Lucky
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 5,674
Rep Power: 65
LuckyTran has a spectacular aura aboutLuckyTran has a spectacular aura aboutLuckyTran has a spectacular aura about
If this is a steady simulation then you should get the same results regardless of initial conditions.
LuckyTran is online now   Reply With Quote

Old   March 24, 2022, 08:04
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Sam
Join Date: Mar 2022
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0
Seven277 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by LuckyTran View Post
If this is a steady simulation then you should get the same results regardless of initial conditions.
Understood, I thought this might be the case, I was instructed in this assignment to use steady simulation, then compare the difference between the speeds, so a little confused as to what I am expected to do here and the point of spending the last 2 days running simulations when 1 would have sufficed.

Thanks for your help!
Seven277 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 25, 2022, 02:01
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
Lucky
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 5,674
Rep Power: 65
LuckyTran has a spectacular aura aboutLuckyTran has a spectacular aura aboutLuckyTran has a spectacular aura about
Perhaps the assignment is to run with different boundary conditions.


You can find boundary conditions in regions, find your boundaries, and check out the physics conditions and physics values.
Aeronautics El. K. likes this.
LuckyTran is online now   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Strange results from boundary conditions. SHAFKAT91 FLUENT 3 April 18, 2017 13:42
Wrong multiphase flow at rotating interface Sanyo CFX 14 February 7, 2017 17:19
Transient results with periodic boundary conditions? holgerbre Main CFD Forum 4 January 17, 2017 16:15
Running transient with steady results as initial conditions cwl STAR-CCM+ 4 November 29, 2016 09:31
Wrong flow in ratating domain problem Sanyo CFX 17 August 15, 2015 06:20


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 23:21.