|
[Sponsors] |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
Greetings,
I am currently doing a project on simulating mass transfer(diffusion) using passive scalar. In this project, i am using lagrangian particles as the source and i need a way to measure the total diffusion from the particles. My current way of plotting the total value of passive scalar through a boundary(outlet) is to use a field sum monitor with a user field function that have the definition of "${Boundary Passive Scalar Flux}*${TimeStep}". However, the value I get is about 9 to 10 times bigger than the value I get from the sum report (passive scalar) in the prior region. Am I missing something in my field function definition or another variable that i should take into consideration? With thanks, A CFD Beginner |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
boundary flux, outlet, passive scalar |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Intuition for why flow follows convex surfaces | lopp | Main CFD Forum | 47 | February 1, 2022 14:14 |
No under-relaxation in passive scalar | jose_prime | Main CFD Forum | 0 | July 23, 2020 14:12 |
Match Pressure Inlet/Outlet Boundary Condition Mass Flow Rate | MSchneid | Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming | 3 | February 23, 2019 07:00 |
Abnormal (?) Passive Scalar behaviour | cwl | STAR-CCM+ | 1 | October 3, 2014 09:05 |
fluid flow fundas | ram | Main CFD Forum | 5 | June 17, 2000 22:31 |