|
[Sponsors] |
February 26, 2023, 23:54 |
Question regarding mesh Calculations
|
#1 |
New Member
Ali
Join Date: Feb 2023
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0 |
I am a bachelor student currently working on a CFD Simulation of a Formula Student Vehicle at maximum speed (40 m/s).
With my current mesh settings, and the selection of k-w SST model, the residuals remain fluctuating at 10^-3 for continuity, x, y and z momentum, 10^-2 for Tke, and 10^-5 for Sdr. My current mesh settings are as follows: Default Controls: triangle mesh, trimmed cell mesher. Base Size 1.0 m Target Surface Size 130% Minimum Surface Size 0.001m Surface Curvature: 10 pts/circle 200 pts/circle maximum 6E-4 m Surface Proximity: 32 points in gap (Rest is default) Surface growth rate: 1.65 Maximum number of connected surfaces: 10000000 10 prism layers 1.3 growth rate, thickness of 0.15m 1 Volume Growth layer Custom Controls: Enhanced quality triangle surface mesh. Target surface size: 2% Prism Layers: 24 layers, thickness ratio 1.3, thickness 0.045m Minimum cell size 0.003m Curvature: 48 pts/circle, 480 max pts per circle, 7E-4 curvature deviation distance Edge proximity of 32 no of faces Surface growth rate 1.2 12 trimmer surface growth layers. This results in cell count of 21.5 million cells. These settings were determined by using the equations for skin friction coefficient, shear stress and y+, along with boundary layer thickness equation for a flat plate. I was wondering if the present process to determine minimum cell size is erroneous. What is the process used to determine minimum cell size, number and thickness of prism layers, growth ratio and prism layer thickness ratio for a model with steady incompressible turbulent flow? |
|
March 8, 2023, 05:35 |
|
#2 | |
Senior Member
Lefteris
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 337
Rep Power: 15 |
Quote:
What is the desired outcome of your simulations (i.e., what are you studying this for? Drag? Detection of areas of separated flow?...) Are you simulating a full car with rotating wheels? Non rotating wheels? Why have you assumed this is a steady state problem? Have you done a mesh sensitivity study? These are just some questions to hopefully help you investigate your assumptions and your method.
__________________
Lefteris |
||
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[snappyHexMesh] High quality mesh for wind in complex urban environment | ziboaa | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 1 | January 12, 2021 15:33 |
GeometricField -> mesh() Function | Tobi | OpenFOAM Programming & Development | 10 | November 19, 2020 11:33 |
[ICEM] Bad Quality Hybrid Mesh External Flow | tim13 | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 0 | March 8, 2020 02:22 |
Gambit problems | Althea | FLUENT | 22 | January 4, 2017 03:19 |
Icemcfd 11: Loss of mesh from surface mesh option? | Joe | CFX | 2 | March 26, 2007 18:10 |