CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > Siemens > STAR-CCM+

Convergence problems post impact[URGENT help needed]

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   February 4, 2011, 03:29
Default Convergence problems post impact[URGENT help needed]
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 100
Rep Power: 17
alastormoody11 is on a distinguished road

I am simulating sloshing in a rectangular tank which is initially moving with a variable acceleration and hits a wall and then starts moving in the opposite direction.

I have successfully simulated the inital part of the problem using the body force approach, in the motion after impact a zero acceleration a constant velocity in the opposite direction.

I am trying to validate my simulation with a paper which has both experimental and numerical results obtained from FLUENTwhich uses a time step of 0.01.

The convergence diffculties were bound to arise after impact due to the sudden change in the direction, however the problem is that even after I have reduced the under-relaxation factors as well as the time step to a ridiculously low degree(I ran the simulation with time step of 0.001s and tried using a time step as low as 1e-7 to no avail) the solution fails to attain a respectable residual level even for a single time step.

If any of you have any suggestions, please reply.

As a last resort I gave a maximum limit on the number of inner iterations eqaul to 750, after which I got results with the highest residuals around the 0.1 mark, though the resemblance to the experimental results is uncanny, I plan to extract quantitative data from the simulation which will be an exercise in fultility unless the simulation is properly converged.

I have tried different grids, however since the experimental results published in the paper basically outline the results in form of images of sloshing, I believe I cannot move in the direction of a very coarse mesh.

Any help in this regard will be highly appreciated.
alastormoody11 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 22, 2011, 08:52
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 636
Rep Power: 21
abdul099 is on a distinguished road
Not sure whether I've understood your problem: You worry about the residuals not falling through the floor in a time step?
Don't give too much about the residuals, and more important, don't give too much about the absolute level of residuals. As they are normalized, you shouln't run it until the residuals are below a certain value. They just need to drop for some (2 - 3) orders of magnitude.
abdul099 is offline   Reply With Quote


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Problems with convergence with an easy system franzdrs Main CFD Forum 0 June 15, 2009 18:17
Weak rotational flow - Convergence Problems Daggemann FLUENT 1 May 8, 2009 09:45
Convergence problems Simone Siemens 5 June 29, 2005 10:48
Convergence problems in CFX5 Soren CFX 18 March 23, 2002 19:32
Problems with convergence and initial guessed fields in compressible steady flows Pedro Gil Main CFD Forum 3 April 25, 2000 11:34

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:13.