CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > Siemens > STAR-CCM+

Grid Independent Study

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By abdul099

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   July 28, 2011, 04:56
Default Grid Independent Study
New Member
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 15
msv_kk is on a distinguished road

My name is Kiran Kumar,Meda, I am doing my Masters at Duisburg -Essen univeristy. Currently I am working on my Thesis which is related to CFD.

I am doing a Grid independent study, I tried to generate three different meshes using Different absolute minimum surface size, form which I would like to select one for my furthure analysis (Validation with Test results).

I am using Ideal Gas , Segregated flow solver, realizable K-Epsilpon model with Two-layer all y+ treatment.

Here is the info about the CFD simulation results,

Min sur size Number of cells Temp o/l (c )
0,6 5262106 79,29
0,4 8345705 84,32
0,3 10565895 83,45
The test resule is 81,6 (c).I would like to continue with the mesh having 0,4 mm as the min surface size.

Now, I had a discussion with my friend, who says ' as the mesh size decreses the resistance to flow decrease, which results in less friction ,less turbulence intensity. So the temperature at the oulet for mesh (0.3) should be higher than mesh (0.4)'.

Is this argument correct ? he also says as we go on reducing the min surface size, the resitance to flow decreases which results in high temperature at the outlet.

Thanking you

Best Regards,
Kiran Kumar,Meda
msv_kk is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 1, 2011, 02:17
Senior Member
sail's Avatar
Vieri Abolaffio
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Always on the move.
Posts: 308
Rep Power: 16
sail is on a distinguished road
Originally Posted by msv_kk View Post

My name is Kiran ....
an increase in 10% (cell count between 0.3 and 0.4) is not considered sufficient to analyse the grid dependency of a simulation. while the sacred books recommend a 2x for every step, it is not always possible and an increment of 50% is usually tolerated.

i don't really understand your friend point. about winch velocity and resistance is he talking about? ideally there shoudent' be any differences in the flow.
sail is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 7, 2011, 15:54
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 636
Rep Power: 21
abdul099 is on a distinguished road
Additionally to sail's post, I suggest to modify the base size instead of the min surface size. The min surface size affects the mesh only on faces with strong curvature or with close proximity to other faces. All other faces will be meshed with the target surface size, so it might not be meaningful to reduce only the min surface size.

And it's nearly impossible to give any statement whether it makes sense with higher / lower / whatever temperatures when modifying any mesh sizes. I don't even know if the gas should cool down in the domain or should heat up. So it's impossible to give any statement!
biswajit likes this.
abdul099 is offline   Reply With Quote


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
how to do a grid independent study xyq102296 ANSYS 16 November 11, 2021 08:05
What is meant by Grid Independence Study? Khan FLUENT 10 July 2, 2015 22:40
Grid Independent Study for a car John222 Main CFD Forum 1 January 26, 2011 19:05
Combustion Convergence problems Art Stretton Phoenics 5 April 2, 2002 05:59
Grid Independent Solution Hesham M. Aly FLUENT 2 October 5, 2000 08:24

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 18:39.