|
[Sponsors] |
December 29, 2017, 08:48 |
Transient Particle Deposition Analysis
|
#1 |
New Member
Shyam
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 8 |
Hi all,
I am running an unsteady particle deposition analysis on a throat model. I am analysing the deposition of the particles on the wall boundary and I came across this on the tutorial guide for unsteady flows: “In STAR-CCM+, it is possible to select the specific boundary interaction mode to control the outcome of a particle satisfying the adhere condition. The default in unsteady is Stick” I was just wondering what the difference between this ‘’stick’’ condition and analysing the particle deposition using boundary sampling with the wall as the boundary. Shouldn’t these two be showing the same thing because they are both monitoring when the particles contact the boundary? Thanks in advance |
|
Tags |
boundary, particle, star ccm+, transient, unsteady |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
UDF for particle interception with pt_termination fortran routine | abcdefgh | CFX | 6 | October 6, 2019 13:30 |
UDF for DPM particle deposition modelingpa | haghshenasfard | Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming | 10 | September 15, 2019 02:03 |
Importing solution from thermal steady state analysis to transient analysis | david_1995 | ANSYS | 0 | July 31, 2017 05:54 |
Cfx transient analysis | maheshchamarti | CFX | 0 | July 10, 2017 09:52 |
Transient analysis | vikram92 | ANSYS | 0 | March 15, 2017 04:38 |