CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > Siemens > STAR-CD

Bai model droplet-wall impact / elastic rebound

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   November 15, 2012, 07:05
Default Bai model droplet-wall impact / elastic rebound
  #1
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Thessaloniki, Greece
Posts: 75
Rep Power: 14
crevoise is on a distinguished road
Hello,

I am dealing with some Lagrangian simulation of droplet injection into a pipe.
For the droplet-wall interaction, I am using the Bai model. I am testing the injection for different case, and I am concerned about cases when the droplets should bounce from the wall after the impact.

Normally, the Bai model is using the following equation for the droplet velocity after rebound (a=after impact, b=before impact), respectively for tangential and normal velocity:
U_{d,a}=e_{1}U_{d,b}=\dfrac{5}{7}U_{d,b}
V_{d,a}=e_{2}V_{d,b}=-eV_{d,b}
Where e is the restitution coefficient defined by Grant and Tabakoff, regarding the incident angle.

However, when investigating the velocities before and after the rebound, it seems the rebound is modeled as an elastic rebound, so the tangential velocity is not affected and the normal one only change of sign.
In the methodology manual, it is noticed that e1 an e2 are set to 1 in case of elastic rebound.

My question is then the following: how to specify to StarCD to do not use an elastic rebound, but the proper Bai relation? For now, I have no clue how to set up the Bai model properly concerning the rebound.

Thanks a lot for any help
crevoise is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 15, 2012, 10:42
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Pauli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 189
Rep Power: 17
Pauli is on a distinguished road
If you want elastic rebound, switch from Bai to Rebound.

You said "it seems" you are getting elastic rebound using Bai. Did you compute (back calculate) the restitution coefficient & see if it agrees with the value given by the incidence angle formula? Maybe your incidence angle is such that the rebound is nearly elastic.
Pauli is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 15, 2012, 11:06
Default
  #3
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Thessaloniki, Greece
Posts: 75
Rep Power: 14
crevoise is on a distinguished road
Hi Pauli,

Thank you for your answer.

I actually do not wish to have an elastic rebound, so that I was switching to Bai model to investigate different injection case (Later, I will also investigate the splashing regime).

I checked the incident angle which is around 37° (How to determine the elastic rebound limit incident angle? What is the limitation of the 'rebound model' in the Bai model?), so that the restitution coefficient should be of 0.37.
My incident normal velocity is of 20m/s, which should give a rebound velocity of 7m/s applying the Bai model, but startCD provides a rebound velocity of 20m/s (as for elastic rebound).

Thanks again for your info.
crevoise is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 15, 2012, 14:06
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
Pauli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 189
Rep Power: 17
Pauli is on a distinguished road
Sounds like you have the makings of a support request.
Pauli is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
bai model, impact velocity, lagrangian particle, rebound


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
DPM model, droplet size distribution in atomizer model davidx FLUENT 3 May 5, 2017 03:18
Superlinear speedup in OpenFOAM 13 msrinath80 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 18 March 3, 2015 05:36
Water subcooled boiling Attesz CFX 7 January 5, 2013 03:32
Wall Treatment of User defined Turbulence Model Yang Chung FLUENT 0 August 23, 2008 11:31
Wall functions Abhijit Tilak Main CFD Forum 6 February 5, 1999 01:16


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 21:37.