CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > SU2

Inaccurate gradient results from continuous Adjoint method

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   December 23, 2013, 17:22
Default Inaccurate gradient results from continuous Adjoint method
New Member
Yeongmin Jo
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 12
Yminjo is on a distinguished road
Dear all,

I'm studying global optimization methods.
Currently, I consider airfoil design as the application.
However, I have found inaccurate gradient results when I use the continuous Adjoint method which is enclosed in the SU2-Suite.
Here is the information of the airfoil design.

Airfoil: RAE2822
Mach number = 0.75
AoA= 1.25deg
Design variables= 5 Hicks-Henne bump functions on the upper surface of the airfoil

In order to measure the accuracy of the Adjoint method,
I considered 2 bump functions, and compared gradient values
from the Adjoint method and finite difference method.
All computation conditions(grid, # of CPUs, etc) were same except the method.

The above is the two plots.
White and red plots were each calculated using the finite difference and the Adjoint method.
As you can see, the overall trends and the magnitudes of the plots are different each other.
Since step size for the finite difference method was selected by some tests,
I think the finite difference method is accurate.

What makes the difference? Is this a limitation of the Adjoint method?
Yminjo is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 11, 2014, 22:08
Super Moderator
Francisco Palacios
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 404
Rep Power: 15
fpalacios is on a distinguished road
If you have a while, please take a look at

Best Regards,
fpalacios is offline   Reply With Quote


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Inaccurate animation or inaccurate results? niraj12321 ANSYS 1 August 10, 2010 13:33
Fluent 6.3.26 vs 12.1 and partition method Anorky FLUENT 0 April 27, 2010 10:55
Comparison: Finite Volume Method vs. Analytic Method m-fry Main CFD Forum 1 April 20, 2010 14:40
why dynamic mesh method give wrong results? weiyang1980 Main CFD Forum 0 September 22, 2009 21:06
SIMPLE Algorithm & Conjugate Gradient Method Abhijit Tilak Main CFD Forum 7 March 20, 2001 00:01

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 19:50.