|
[Sponsors] |
February 10, 2017, 07:36 |
The transition model in SU2_5.0
|
#1 |
Member
Li Ji
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 33
Rep Power: 11 |
It is great that the newest version of SU2 is released. I have noticed the announcements for the transition model. Can it be used for the simulation now?
|
|
February 12, 2017, 07:35 |
|
#2 | |
Member
C
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 37
Rep Power: 13 |
Quote:
https://github.com/su2code/SU2/wiki/...nal-Flat-Plate I would be very pleased if you would apply the transition model to your own case and provide me some feedback. Thanks! |
||
February 13, 2017, 01:48 |
|
#3 | |
Member
Li Ji
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 33
Rep Power: 11 |
Quote:
Thank you! |
||
February 13, 2017, 02:59 |
|
#4 | |
Member
C
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 37
Rep Power: 13 |
Quote:
You may find the piece of code in SU2_CFD/src/numerics_direct_turbulent.cpp under CSourcePieceWise_TurbSA::ComputeResidual There should be an if (transition) clause. |
||
February 13, 2017, 06:11 |
|
#5 | |
Member
Li Ji
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 33
Rep Power: 11 |
Quote:
|
||
February 13, 2017, 06:39 |
|
#6 |
Member
C
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 37
Rep Power: 13 |
||
February 14, 2017, 04:04 |
|
#7 |
Member
Li Ji
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 33
Rep Power: 11 |
I find that the tutorial in the wiki is a 2D flat plate. Dose the transition model in SU2 can be used in a 3D case?
|
|
February 14, 2017, 06:07 |
|
#8 |
Member
C
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 37
Rep Power: 13 |
||
February 14, 2017, 20:10 |
|
#9 |
Member
Li Ji
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 33
Rep Power: 11 |
||
February 22, 2017, 21:47 |
|
#10 |
Member
Li Ji
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 33
Rep Power: 11 |
I want to study the theory of the transition model in SU2. Can you help me some literatures besides the SU2 wiki?
|
|
February 22, 2017, 22:58 |
|
#11 |
Member
C
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 37
Rep Power: 13 |
For now, you may refer to the study below. This study doesnt cover it much detailed, also the current formulation differs, but it would help.
http://arc.aiaa.org/doi/abs/10.2514/6.2013-2531 I would let you know after the most recent study is published. |
|
February 23, 2017, 02:17 |
|
#12 |
Member
Li Ji
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 33
Rep Power: 11 |
Thank you!
|
|
March 21, 2017, 20:48 |
|
#13 |
Member
Li Ji
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 33
Rep Power: 11 |
I have run the test case S&K following the tutorial, and the good result is obtained. Can I perform the S&K case in a compressible solver under a lower Mach number, such as Ma = 0.15? In fact, I have make such a test, but the result looks like that the flow is full turbulent. There is no transition existed.
|
|
March 21, 2017, 22:06 |
|
#14 | |
Member
C
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 37
Rep Power: 13 |
Quote:
|
||
March 21, 2017, 22:30 |
|
#15 |
Member
Li Ji
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 33
Rep Power: 11 |
Can you let me know your email and help me to check my configure file?
|
|
March 22, 2017, 02:01 |
|
#16 |
Member
C
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 37
Rep Power: 13 |
||
March 22, 2017, 03:04 |
|
#17 |
Member
Li Ji
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 33
Rep Power: 11 |
Thanks, please check your PM.
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Wrong flow in ratating domain problem | Sanyo | CFX | 17 | August 15, 2015 06:20 |
Turbulence model for transition | Stormbringer505 | FLUENT | 0 | August 6, 2015 09:42 |
gamma-Retheta transition model | mb.pejvak | Main CFD Forum | 0 | October 23, 2012 01:03 |
where to set CFX Transition Model? | steven | CFX | 6 | January 17, 2007 11:19 |
model transition | nico | FLUENT | 0 | February 8, 2004 09:04 |