|
[Sponsors] |
March 15, 2021, 07:21 |
su2 7.1.0 wall function
|
#1 |
New Member
remzi
Join Date: Mar 2021
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 |
Hey,
I could not use the wall function option in su2 version 7.1.0 . I am trying to solve basic external flow problem with farfield (farfield BC) and a blunted body (heat flux BC). The error I encountered : Tau_wall evaluation has not converged in CNSSolver.cpp Could you please help me about using the wall function? Thanks. % Viscous wall markers for which wall functions must be applied. (NONE = no marker) % Format: ( marker name, wall function type -NO_WALL_FUNCTION, STANDARD_WALL_FUNCTION, % ADAPTIVE_WALL_FUNCTION, SCALABLE_WALL_FUNCTION, EQUILIBRIUM_WALL_MODEL, % NONEQUILIBRIUM_WALL_MODEL-, ... ) MARKER_WALL_FUNCTIONS= ( body, STANDARD_WALL_FUNCTION ) |
|
March 16, 2021, 13:28 |
|
#2 |
New Member
Brandon Gleeson
Join Date: Apr 2018
Posts: 26
Rep Power: 8 |
Hi aerocfdD,
I have seen this issue as well, at least in v7.0.0. At one time I looked farther into it and concluded the iterative solver for Tau_wall is not always robust enough to converge. If I recall correctly, it runs a maximum of 10 iterations with a 25% correction of the error between the initial value and updated value for Tau_wall. In some cases (e.g. a handful of cells in a domain) I found that the algorithm will reach a condition where it toggles between two values for Tau_wall (well apart from the convergence condition) and thus it never converges. I was able to replicate the scenario in a spreadsheet, and even when given thousands of iterations to converge it never stabilizes in these cases. So for now I've concluded that the wall function scheme isn't yet reliable for some problems, so when I need accurate near-wall modeling it's best to adjust my grids to get yPlus ≈ 1 and not use the SU2 wall models. Regards, Brandon |
|
March 16, 2021, 18:57 |
|
#3 |
Senior Member
Pedro Gomes
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 466
Rep Power: 13 |
Hello,
This has been "work in progress" for a long time but now actual progress is being made https://github.com/su2code/SU2/pull/1204 The person working on it improved that iterative solver. Stay tuned or go over to github and use the branch directly (with caution) attention from the "outside world" is always good motivation, and pretty much the only reward we developers get. Cheers, Pedro |
|
March 17, 2021, 05:19 |
|
#4 |
Senior Member
bigfoot
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 634
Rep Power: 18 |
Hi, "the person working on it" here. I would appreciate it if you could try your case on the Work-In-Progress feature branch. I'm mainly working on incompressible cases, so I've not done any testing yet with compressible, and I'm assuming that your case uses the compressible solver? The original implementation also did not have walls with nonzero heatflux implemented. Do you have a heated wall or is your heat flux zero?
|
|
March 18, 2021, 11:54 |
|
#5 |
New Member
Brandon Gleeson
Join Date: Apr 2018
Posts: 26
Rep Power: 8 |
Hi bigfoot,
That's awesome you're working on the wall functions, I think this could be a big improvement to the code! I'll get my hands on your WIP code and try it on a grid here soon. Yes, my cases in the past were compressible with a mix of isothermal and adiabatic wall conditions. |
|
March 21, 2021, 10:32 |
|
#6 | |
New Member
remzi
Join Date: Mar 2021
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 |
Quote:
Thanks for all your helps and care. Sorry I could not write on the form earlier. Yes ı am trying to solve the compressible flow case with zero heat flux wall. However, I am also interested with different problems such as internal flow problems with heated walls . Are the wall function code going to be fully usable for all type of problems ? I will try Work-In-Progress feature branch version of the code as soon as possible for the case ı asked and other cases. Thanks again for this wonderfull open-source code and your supports . |
||
March 22, 2021, 05:51 |
|
#7 |
Senior Member
bigfoot
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 634
Rep Power: 18 |
I made an update over the weekend and it runs smoothly now for my incompressible diffuser case. At the moment it does not handle (ignores) the effect of isothermal boundary conditions on the boundary layer.
|
|
Tags |
su2, su2 7, su2 7.1.0, su2 boundary condition, wall function |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[mesh manipulation] RefineMesh Error and Foam warning | jiahui_93 | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 4 | March 3, 2018 12:32 |
Enhanced Wall Treatment | paduchev | FLUENT | 24 | January 8, 2018 12:55 |
Compile problem | ivanyao | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 1 | October 12, 2012 10:31 |
Version 15 on Mac OS X | gschaider | OpenFOAM Installation | 113 | December 2, 2009 11:23 |
Droplet Evaporation | Christian | Main CFD Forum | 2 | February 27, 2007 07:27 |