|
[Sponsors] |
Strange wall time measurements for code profiling SU2 |
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
New Member
Ioannis Mandralis
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 5 ![]() |
Dear all,
I am trying to test the performance of the SU2 code. To do this I need to measure the wall time taken per iteration. I am using a dual time-stepping approach. I noticed that for each new outer iteration, the wall time elapsed seems to jump and then decrease for each inner iteration. This doesn't happen for the first and last outer iteration of the simulation. Is it possible that there is a problem with the wall time screen output, or that I am not choosing the correct options in the configuration file ? Thanks in advance. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Pedro Gomes
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 466
Rep Power: 13 ![]() |
The wall time output is an average per iteration.
The total time of one outer iteration is the last wall time value times N+1 (N the inner iteration). |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Pedro Gomes
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 466
Rep Power: 13 ![]() |
By the way, if you are measuring the performance of SU2 please make sure you use the best configuration possible for that
https://su2code.github.io/docs_v7/Bu...-optimizations |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
New Member
Ioannis Mandralis
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 5 ![]() |
Dear Pedro,
Thank you very much for your response - that clarifies how to test the time taken per iteration. I will make sure I am using all the correct optimizations. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
bash script for pseudo-parallel usage of reconstructPar | kwardle | OpenFOAM Post-Processing | 42 | May 7, 2024 23:17 |
SU2 7.0.7 Built on CentOS 7, parallel computation pyscript mpi exit error? | EternalSeekerX | SU2 | 3 | October 9, 2020 18:28 |
pressure in incompressible solvers e.g. simpleFoam | chrizzl | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 13 | March 28, 2017 05:49 |
Micro Scale Pore, icoFoam | gooya_kabir | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 2 | November 2, 2013 13:58 |
Upgraded from Karmic Koala 9.10 to Lucid Lynx10.04.3 | bookie56 | OpenFOAM Installation | 8 | August 13, 2011 04:03 |