|
[Sponsors] |
Rocket Ma=2.089 - void CSolver::SetResidual_RMS(const CGeometry*, const CConfig*) |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
October 19, 2021, 17:07 |
Rocket Ma=2.089 - void CSolver::SetResidual_RMS(const CGeometry*, const CConfig*)
|
#1 |
Senior Member
Alain Islas
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: Mexico
Posts: 142
Rep Power: 6 |
Hello SU2 community,
I am modeling a rocket (fuselage only) at supersonic flow (Ma = 2.089) conditions. - Models: Turbulence: kw-SST Viscosity: SUTHERLAND Conductivity: CONSTANT_PRANDTL EOS : IDEAL_GAS - Fluid properties: Ref. Viscosity = 1.716e-05 N.s/m^2 Sutherland Temp. = 273.15 K Sutherland Const = 110.4 K Prandtl (Lam.) = 0.72 Prandtl (Turb.) = 0.9 Gas Constant = 287.058 N.m/kg.K Spec. Heat Ratio = 1.4 Initial and free-stream conditions: Static Pressure = 84257.3 Pa Density = 1.04824 kg/m^3 Temperature = 280.011 K Total Energy = 453854 m^2/s^2 Velocity-X = 700.769 m/s Velocity-Y = 0 m/s Velocity-Z = 0 m/s Velocity Magnitude = 700.769 m/s Viscosity = 1.74976e-05 N.s/m^2 Conductivity = 85310.9 W/m^2.K Turb. Kin. Energy = 7366.16 m^2/s^2 Spec. Dissipation = 4.41291e+07 1/s Mach Number = 2.089 Reynolds Number = 1.8262e+06 My geometry consists of a 3D structured grid generated via ICEM (.cgns formati) with minimum orthogonality 21.81. +--------------------------------------------------------------+ | Mesh Quality Metric| Minimum| Maximum| +--------------------------------------------------------------+ | Orthogonality Angle (deg.)| 21.1814| 89.9999| | CV Face Area Aspect Ratio| 1.05976| 1.35169e+06| | CV Sub-Volume Ratio| 1.00003| 2930.34| +--------------------------------------------------------------+ I only have FAR_FIELD, SYMMETRY and WALL markers. The walls are assumed as adiabatic, and my turbulent properties are: FREESTREAM_TURBULENCEINTENSITY= 0.10 & FREESTREAM_TURB2LAMVISCRATIO= 10.0 I am solving the flow with 1st order upwind schemes, linear solver: BCGSTAB with ILU preconditioner. My CFL is 0.2. I Use 3 multigrid V cycles. Can anyone help me to figure out what´s going wrong with the setup? I get the following error: void CSolver::SetResidual_RMS(const CGeometry*, const CConfig*). My residual for omega is always positive during the calculation. So I guess is related to the turbulence initialization... |
|
October 20, 2021, 05:36 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Pedro Gomes
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 465
Rep Power: 13 |
Try starting at a lower mach number.
It's a bit challenging to start a turbulent simulation Mach 2 from scratch. |
|
October 20, 2021, 08:13 |
|
#3 |
Senior Member
Alain Islas
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: Mexico
Posts: 142
Rep Power: 6 |
Dear Pedro,
Thank you for your reply. I started a new simulation with Ma = 1. I could run the case for more iterations, this time the Omega Residual reached negative values, but I had the same error. I checked the flow in paraview, and I found some weird cells with excessive temperature (clipped by >2000 K). Do you think the divergence is attributed to this? Are there any temperature limiters in SU2? |
|
October 21, 2021, 11:20 |
|
#4 |
Senior Member
Pedro Gomes
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 465
Rep Power: 13 |
Try turning off the multigrid and using fgmres instead of bcgstab.
Our multigrid does not work very well with the type of mesh you have (high aspect ratio in the Fairfield). |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[snappyHexMesh] snappyHexMesh error "Cannot determine normal vector from patches." | lethu | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 1 | June 3, 2020 07:49 |
Fatal error: invalid wall function specification | kcc49 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 13 | September 26, 2018 04:07 |
[mesh manipulation] RefineMesh Error and Foam warning | jiahui_93 | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 4 | March 3, 2018 11:32 |
[mesh manipulation] refineMesh Error | mohsen.boojari | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 3 | March 1, 2018 22:07 |
chtMultiRegionSimpleFoam: crash on parallel run | student666 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 3 | April 20, 2017 11:05 |