|
[Sponsors] |
What is the best proper value of second per iteration? |
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
New Member
MINSUL LEE
Join Date: Apr 2023
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 3 ![]() |
Hello everyone!
I'm novice of running CFD. So I don't know proper seconds per iteration. I know that it depends on problem. But, generally, Do you have any guideline about this? In my case, 5 sec / iteration using 124 core.. Is it proper or not? Thank you! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
bigfoot
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 718
Rep Power: 21 ![]() |
A case I have has 1M points and the RANS solver with SA runs 5 s/iteration on 1 core.
So if it is scaling entirely linearly, then a 124M points case will also run 5s/iteration on 124 cores. First thing to check is if your code was compiled with optimization on (debugging off, optimization flag -O2) and if you get a proper linear time reduction in nr of cores when using mpi. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
pimpleFoam residual increase in final iteration | AhmedHafez | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 0 | December 1, 2022 04:03 |
Slow calculation time on CFD server | killian153 | Hardware | 4 | July 27, 2021 08:28 |
Free surface issues with interDyMFoam for hydroturbine | oumnion | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 0 | October 6, 2017 15:05 |
Hardware-Configuration for Fluent HPC-Pack (8x) | JohHaas | Hardware | 9 | March 3, 2015 14:25 |
Parallel runs slower with MTU=9000 than MTU=1500 | Javier Larrondo | FLUENT | 0 | October 28, 2007 23:30 |