|
[Sponsors] |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
|
Hi, i'm a beginner in ICEM and have a little problem in meshing. maybe this is a stupid question but I couldn't find any threads covering this issue, If there is any, please suggest it
![]() Well I have this complex geometry that I have meshed in both Gambit and ICEM but with different mesh results. Here are the images: This one is a round step-shaped geometry which is meshed fine in Gambit but not in ICEM: Gambit: ![]() ICEM: ![]() Similary, here are the images of a meshed pillar-shaped geometry, Both meshed using GAMBIT and ICEM: GAMBIT: ![]() ICEM: ![]() As you can see there are lots of differences between these two meshes.I am unable to get that fine mesh using ICEM. I tried these: 1) importing Gambit mesh into ICEM and tried to understand how can I do these steps to mesh my geometry: ---a) delete volume mesh ---b) keeping face meshes ---c) do my preferred edits ---d) volume mesh it Tried a lot, but No Idea how to do these steps! in other words I don't know how to continue meshing a pre-meshed GAMBIT file in ICEM (is it even possible?) 2) I even tried to use Quad dominant mesh type, But as I read some forum posts, I figured out that it is not suitable for CFD cases. Any help is appreciated, bests Mojtaba |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
|
Any suggestions for this?
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Senior Member
|
Hi Ali,
Well that's not the problem. even by reducing mesh size I still can't get a mesh volume like GAMBIT. the other problem is that reducing size too much causes huge number of cells, which I'm trying to avoid. I wonder if there are any particular meshing procedures in ICEM which i'm not aware of. best |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Senior Member
Astio Lamar
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Pipe
Posts: 186
Rep Power: 13 ![]() |
Hello.
Why you are interesting tetra mesh rather than hexa? Use the block strategy to generate hexa mesh. It will generate precise mesh with less elements compare to tetra. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Senior Member
|
Quote:
I will try that. but right now I have no idea what blocking is! maybe I need some study. Tnx
__________________
Learn OpenFOAM in Persian SFO (StarCCM+ FLUENT OpenFOAM) Project Team Member Complex Heat & Flow Simulation Research Group If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough. "Richard Feynman" |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Senior Member
Astio Lamar
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Pipe
Posts: 186
Rep Power: 13 ![]() |
Try some tutorials. you can find ICEM manual in the internet. Also take a look on this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9h97FvWJPcY If still you have a problem, share your geometry, I will help you. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Senior Member
|
Quote:
those tutorials helped a lot. I wil try meshing my geometry again to see what happens. bests
__________________
Learn OpenFOAM in Persian SFO (StarCCM+ FLUENT OpenFOAM) Project Team Member Complex Heat & Flow Simulation Research Group If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough. "Richard Feynman" |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
PEM Fuel cell module meshes. ICEM vs workbench | aarvay | FLUENT | 24 | March 2, 2020 06:50 |
[ICEM] ICEM sizing function >>> Gambit and Ansys meshing | Far | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 6 | March 5, 2013 01:16 |
[ICEM] ICEM sizing function >>> Gambit and Ansys meshing | Far | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 0 | March 3, 2013 10:17 |
[Commercial meshers] different results for meshes produced by gambit and ICEM | zakir hussain | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 1 | April 23, 2012 08:15 |
[ICEM] Gambit to ICEM, any advices ? | Santos-Dumont | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 15 | February 28, 2012 19:07 |