|
[Sponsors] |
[ANSYS Meshing] Is it total thickness is fair enough rather than first layer thickness? |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
December 10, 2015, 08:19 |
Is it total thickness is fair enough rather than first layer thickness?
|
#1 |
Member
Onur
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 42
Rep Power: 10 |
Hi,
When I give a number of boundary layer thickness in inflation mesh,that is,first layer thickness,analysis take a long time.Instead If I would try to do that in total thickness, that will be opposite So, total thickness is stand for to boundary layer thickness x growth rate based on iteration ,that is, depends on number of boundary layer . Like below Boundary layer thickness 0.01 Growth rate 1.2 First boundary layer thickness : 0.01 Second one : 0.01x1.2 Third one : 0.01x1.2x1.2 ...last one (that is number of layer we define) is it correct thought or not? If this is ok, I am going to do that.That's why solver time will be enough |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Prism Layer generation at the zero thickness level | mouli1991 | STAR-CCM+ | 1 | December 22, 2014 05:26 |
Prism layer thickness | HHK | STAR-CCM+ | 1 | December 19, 2014 01:19 |
Wall coordinates and boundary layer thickness | bentmol | Main CFD Forum | 1 | July 3, 2011 20:44 |
Prism Layer Thickness | famerfamer | STAR-CCM+ | 8 | June 3, 2011 14:41 |
[snappyHexMesh] snappy hangs while layer generation | bastil | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 3 | October 29, 2010 07:19 |