|
[Sponsors] |
[GAMBIT] Problem in creating Unite volumes |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
February 11, 2016, 10:46 |
Problem in creating Unite volumes
|
#1 |
Senior Member
Aja
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 496
Rep Power: 14 |
Hi,
I want to unite the numbers of volumes in the following attached model(Gambit file), but edges 152 and 837 have created after uniting. why? These edges create problem for me in designing! I am grateful that guide me. Thanks |
|
February 12, 2016, 08:08 |
|
#2 |
Super Moderator
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41 |
don't know why.
but if you don't want to work with this issue, you may delete your volume (lower geometry disabled). Then delete both surfaces which us the edges. Then create new edge, new surfaces, and finally new volume in your case: delete volume.14 delete surfaces 29 & 358 delete edges 152 & 837 create new edge from vertex 237 & 332 create surface from edge 303 / 813 / 55 / new edge created create surface from edge 163 / 769 / 80 / new edge created create new volume
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider |
|
February 12, 2016, 09:34 |
|
#3 |
Senior Member
Aja
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 496
Rep Power: 14 |
Thanks.
According the your guidance, It is fixed. But Now I want to split Volume 98 with face 419 or 418. But it doesn't apply correctly!! Why?? |
|
February 15, 2016, 01:24 |
|
#4 |
Super Moderator
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41 |
because your face 418 lies "exactly" on your volume.
If you want to split a real volume with a surface, the dimensions of your surface have to be much greater than your volume. In your case you need to extend surface 418 in z direction. *sweep edge 951 with edge 953 (in z-negative direction) *unite the created surface with face 418 *retry to split your volume with this new surface. It will work
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider |
|
February 15, 2016, 06:27 |
|
#5 |
Senior Member
Aja
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 496
Rep Power: 14 |
Thanks.
But Mentioned surfaces don't unite!! please see video file. http://www.4shared.com/video/RmaDh-r...itled_149.html |
|
February 15, 2016, 06:37 |
|
#6 |
Super Moderator
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41 |
maybe gambit gave you another name for surfae.
just sweep your surface in order to catch all your volume. unite both surfaces et re-split
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider |
|
February 15, 2016, 06:49 |
|
#7 |
Senior Member
Aja
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 496
Rep Power: 14 |
Thanks.
Ok, I created United surface! Now again, It don't splits correctly!! please see the following gambit file; |
|
February 15, 2016, 06:55 |
|
#8 |
Super Moderator
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41 |
you need also to extende your surface in y direction.
Delete you blue surface create a plane 2x2 centered-yz it will do the job
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider |
|
February 15, 2016, 07:00 |
|
#9 |
Senior Member
Aja
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 496
Rep Power: 14 |
I performed your statement, but again it don't work!!
|
|
February 15, 2016, 07:26 |
|
#10 |
Super Moderator
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41 |
It works from my side
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider |
|
February 15, 2016, 07:42 |
|
#11 |
Senior Member
Aja
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 496
Rep Power: 14 |
||
February 15, 2016, 07:44 |
|
#12 |
Super Moderator
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41 |
why do you say it doesn't work?
what kind of message gives you gambit?
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider |
|
February 15, 2016, 09:00 |
|
#13 |
Senior Member
Aja
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 496
Rep Power: 14 |
please see the following pictures:
|
|
February 15, 2016, 09:08 |
|
#14 |
Super Moderator
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41 |
from your 9999.dbs
Untitled.png
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider |
|
February 15, 2016, 09:17 |
|
#15 | |
Senior Member
Aja
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 496
Rep Power: 14 |
Quote:
See post 13. |
||
February 15, 2016, 09:29 |
|
#16 |
Super Moderator
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41 |
alright I didn't watch out
from post 2, you need to increase the accuracy while creating the surface (create surface from edge 303 / 813 / 55 / new edge created) disable automatic tolerance, and give manual tolerance 1e-6
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[ANSYS Meshing] Problem creating two surfaces from two identical curves | KingKraut | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 1 | November 27, 2015 02:00 |
[DesignModeler] Creating multiple solid/fluid volumes. | nvarma | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 1 | May 14, 2015 19:02 |
[GAMBIT] problem with creating two seperate volumes | abhinavkolla89 | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 1 | June 25, 2012 01:08 |
[Commercial meshers] problem meshing two interacting volumes | banerji | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 0 | December 14, 2009 15:59 |
problem in CFX solver about isolated volumes | Yuan | CFX | 2 | August 16, 2004 22:54 |