CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > ANSYS Meshing & Geometry

[ICEM] Nuclear fuel assembly, Mesh Check: "missing internal faces, uncovered faces"

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Like Tree2Likes
  • 2 Post By swparth

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   June 23, 2017, 01:52
Default Nuclear fuel assembly, Mesh Check: "missing internal faces, uncovered faces"
  #1
New Member
 
parth swaroop
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 9
swparth is on a distinguished road
Dear All,

I want to mesh a nuclear fuel channel assembly. It consists of two outer concentric tubes, within which, moderator is flowing through. Inside this tube, there are 28 fuel pins arranged in fashion as shown the figure1 (They are fixed together with the help of an endplate of either side, which is not yet considered). Coolant flows through these sub channels. Inside this fuel, there is an heating element which produces constant power in order to simulate heat production from fission events. I have tried two meshing approach, both of which yield different set of problem.

1) Since the fuel pins are placed eccentric to outer tube, the geometry is symmetric about y plane. Hence I first create a 2D blocking in one half of the inlet plane as shown in figure 2. I convert the pre-mesh into mesh. Mirror this mesh (figure3) and extrude the mesh along z direction to complete the mesh in 3D domain. I run check mesh twice, one prior to mirror and one after the extrude ( all parts inherited and extruded along the curve). For check mesh prior to mirror, there are no issues expect for single edges on the periphery of the domain. However, after extrusion, I getting errors : " missing internal faces" and " uncovered faces" as shown in the figure. Another thing that I noticed was my mesh quality went down from 0.6 to 0.2 after extruding.

For this, initially I pushed the fix button ( which would create line elements at those surfaces). Now, I import this mesh into CFX it generates an error message : " hexahedral element 77352 will degenerate to an invalid element ". I assumed that this would be due to " missing internal faces" and " uncovered faces" error or either due to mesh quality. So, I tried 1) mesh smoothing to improve the minimum quality of mesh from 0.2 to 0.4 which still would get the same error message. Hence for these elements i tried the associate mesh with geometry by selecting these particular elements, but then nothing happened (These elements in the subset are just shown for visualisation?). I realised that I was mirroring and extruding only shell elements and I could fix " missing internal faces" and " uncovered faces" by choosing "line" elements as well. But this now generates " multiple edges" during check mesh which only a "possible error" (figure4) but I still get the same error mesh from cfx : " hexahedral element 136197 will degenerate to an invalid element ".

Now, I do not know how to fix this error, in the current approach. I guess, longer approach would be to mirror and extrude blocking ( as well my curves and points). I would like to know if there is any other fix, before trying this tedious approach? ( I have tried this as well, and will post the message a bit later)

P.S I am new to ICEM, and this my understanding from the past 2 months. Hence, is there something very basic that I am missing?

Link to my model : https://drive.google.com/open?id=0By...kd1aFJHdE95YVU
Regards

Parth
Attached Images
File Type: jpg multipleedges-fig4.jpg (79.8 KB, 29 views)
Attached Files
File Type: pdf geometry-fig1.pdf (93.0 KB, 10 views)
File Type: pdf blocks-fig2.pdf (43.3 KB, 9 views)
gauravkmr and aero_head like this.

Last edited by swparth; June 23, 2017 at 02:13. Reason: Link to model added
swparth is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 23, 2017, 04:32
Default Attempt 2
  #2
New Member
 
parth swaroop
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 9
swparth is on a distinguished road
2) So as I said, in my second variation, I also tried mirroring the blocking and then extruding it. I only associate all the edges to curve and vertices to points in the "inlet" and "outlet " domain but, along the z-direction, I do not associate the geometry (I think they are just too many edges too do one-one association with the curves) Is there a simple trick to do this?

Unfortunately, also partly expected, I do not get the desired pre- mesh. I have attached the figure. Just associating the edges and point on the 2D plane does not guarantee the extrusion to be along the curve since the edges could get attached to other curves and surfaces. I would like to know what are the possible alternatives here?


Link to this model: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0By...kd1aFJHdE95YVU
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 3Dblocks-fig2.jpg (130.8 KB, 11 views)
File Type: jpg 3Dpremesh-fig2.jpg (188.1 KB, 16 views)
swparth is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 27, 2017, 07:12
Default Volume Mesh
  #3
New Member
 
parth swaroop
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 9
swparth is on a distinguished road
I think I figured out why mesh is getting distorted in my second approach i.e when I mirror and extrude my blocks.

It is due to the fact that between two surface elements there is a volume element (or fluid domain) and there is no corresponding surface to it. As a simple example, in my model, I checked this for moderator flow through the outer cylinder ( CT) and inner cylinder (PT).

Initially I associated all the edges along the z direction for these three parts ( CT, PT and moderator region) but the distortion still remain. Hence, I deleted all the face association for these three parts. To my surprise, no mesh was generated ( since i thought there is still edge to curve association, it would generate pre- mesh). So now i associate all faces of CT and PT to the corresponding surfaces of part ( i.e inlet , outlet and along z) and I got the mesh that I expected in these two region. Unfortunately, for the moderator there is no corresponding surface in the inlet and outlet region. Hence, by default it associates these faces to the nearest possible surface. Further, this overwrites my edge association.

Does this mean that face\edge to surface supersedes edge to curve association ?

Further, more complicated would be : how will I associate the faces of the subchannels? i.e fluid path inbetween fuel pin.

Please help.
swparth is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
missing internal faces, multiple edges, uncovered faces, volume meshing

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
decomposePar problem: Cell 0contains face labels out of range vaina74 OpenFOAM Pre-Processing 37 July 20, 2020 05:38
[snappyHexMesh] Error snappyhexmesh - Multiple outside loops avinashjagdale OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 53 March 8, 2019 09:42
foam-extend_3.1 decompose and pyfoam warning shipman OpenFOAM 3 July 24, 2014 08:14
OF 1.6 | Ubuntu 9.10 (64bit) | GLIBCXX_3.4.11 not found piprus OpenFOAM Installation 22 February 25, 2010 13:43
fluent add additional zones for the mesh file SSL FLUENT 2 January 26, 2008 11:55


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:42.