CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > ANSYS Meshing & Geometry

[ANSYS Meshing] Inlet-faces make multizone meshing fail

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   July 31, 2017, 23:15
Question Inlet-faces make multizone meshing fail
  #1
New Member
 
Kosch
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 8
Kosch is on a distinguished road
Hi,

I have a problem.

Background:
I try to simulate a multispecies flow through a perforated pipe.
I can make the simulation with a tet-mesh and it does work but I want to reduce the cell number and therefore want to use the multizone method to generate an hex-mesh.

Problem:
The faces of the inlet holes (where the mutispecies flow leaves the pipe) make the geometry unsweepable. If I remove the holes (in spaceclaim or via virtual topology) the multizone method does work and creates a mesh with good quality and low cell number.

Of course I need the inlet for the simulation though . Is there a way to tell the mesher to "ignore" the faces and have them still available in the simulation? Or what would be a common practise for this kind of challenge?

Kind Regards

PS: I attached a picture of the troublesome part. The yellow slits are the mentioned holes, the blue face is the wall of the pipe. The simulation is symmetric in the XY plane and periodic in X direction (shouldnt matter for the meshing though).
Attached Images
File Type: png sketch_CD.png (50.6 KB, 13 views)
Kosch is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 2, 2017, 18:57
Post
  #2
New Member
 
Kosch
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 8
Kosch is on a distinguished road
If anyone finds it on google on wonders about a solution:

There is no easy solution. One could split the element into smaller pieces which can be meshed with the Hex-Mesh. Disadvantage is that one ends up with a lot of elements.

In my case, I made a small scale simulation showing that the shape of the pipe is not relevant in the large scale of the simulation and simplified the pipe all together and avoided the issue at the end.
Kosch is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[snappyHexMesh] Error snappyhexmesh - Multiple outside loops avinashjagdale OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 53 March 8, 2019 09:42
[snappyHexMesh] SHM is not extruding/adding Layers everywhere matthiasd OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 2 October 16, 2016 16:45
[snappyHexMesh] sHM layer process keeps getting killed MBttR OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 4 August 15, 2016 03:21
DecomposePar unequal number of shared faces maka OpenFOAM Pre-Processing 6 August 12, 2010 09:01
OpenFOAM with IBM AIX matthias OpenFOAM Installation 20 March 25, 2008 02:36


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 21:51.