|
[Sponsors] |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
New Member
Akshay
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 15 ![]() |
Hello,
I am trying to mesh a catalytic converter in GAMBIT and I am completely new to this. I wanted to know where to use the hex mesh and tetrahedral mesh. I would like to know instances where these different types of meshes are used and possibly the advantages of using them. I agree this is pretty basic stuff but I would like to get this sorted as I will be able to best justify my methods to my seniors. Any help would be appreciated ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Super Moderator
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 42 ![]() |
Any geometry may be subdivided into smaller domains (splits).
Splits strategy may allow you to mesh those smaller domains with hexa mesh (if it is possible) If not then you can choose tetrahedral mesh. Benefits for hexa: accuracy, faster convergence and less cells count (for same mesh density in comparison with tetra). But it has a cost: time for achieving full hexa mesh. At the other hand, you have tetrahedral mesh, which could be quick generated.
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
New Member
Akshay
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 15 ![]() |
Thank you very much MAX.
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
gambit, hexahedral, mesh, tetrahedral |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[snappyHexMesh] snappyHexMesh won't work - zeros everywhere! | sc298 | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 2 | March 27, 2011 21:11 |
Highly skewed and inverted volumes in wing mesh | makaero | FLUENT | 0 | December 8, 2009 19:32 |
Importing nodal data and creating volumes and mesh | milton | FLUENT | 0 | June 25, 2008 09:37 |
Alternate method to subtracting volumes? | Daniel Lee | FLUENT | 2 | July 25, 2005 08:58 |