CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS

Simulation Methodology for ANSYS Transient Thermal

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   June 10, 2018, 01:43
Default Simulation Methodology for ANSYS Transient Thermal
  #1
New Member
 
Sumit Agarwal
Join Date: Jun 2018
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0
sumitaero is on a distinguished road
Hello Friend,
I have been working on ANSYS Transient Thermal for a purely conduction problem.
It would be a great help if anyone can suggest as to how the solution methodology works in the case of a Transient Thermal module of ANSYS.

In ANSYS Fluent module, it is clearly visible in the solution part as to what scheme is used or what methodlogy is used to solve a particular problem. It is not the same in case of Transient Thermal module.
sumitaero is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 16, 2018, 20:01
Default
  #2
New Member
 
Taiwan, New Taipei
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Taipei, Taiwan
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 7
suraj9735 is on a distinguished road
Hello everyone,

I have also something similar conceptual problem regarding ANSYS Mechanical vs. Fluent.

I am solving a pure conduction problem in solid, And I test the results in both ANSYS Mechanical and Fluent too.

I have to share something.

ANSYS Mechanical-
1) Gives very good/appropriate/relevant result in automatic mode.
2) I am not familiar with scripting/command in the workbench Mechanical (WM). So I switch to Fluent and easy to use UDF for my model.
3)Very less access of solver through GUI in workbench Mechanical. And I also don't know how to check convergence plot in WM like Fluent shows at every iteration.


Fluent-
1)It's very hard to let the solution converged and doesn't change much with iterations. So it gives bad result comparing to WM.
2)Fluent has very much access to solver through GUI and can set so many things easily about convergence, reports, etc.
3) I think UDF in Fluent is relatively easier than workbench Mechanical scripting or APDL command.


I have two pictures of results given by Mechanical and Fluent of the same case for comparison but have too much difference, Even energy equation is converged till e-14 in Fluent.....

How can I make my result better in Fluent?
How can I study quickly to write command in the workbench Mechanical?
Attached Images
File Type: png mechanical_Result.PNG (47.2 KB, 11 views)
File Type: png Fluent_Result.PNG (49.1 KB, 10 views)

Last edited by suraj9735; December 16, 2018 at 20:03. Reason: to attach some files
suraj9735 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 19, 2018, 08:56
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
Gert-Jan
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,827
Rep Power: 27
Gert-Jan will become famous soon enough
What mesh did you use in WB and in fluent? Same tet mesh?
Gert-Jan is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 19, 2018, 09:17
Default
  #4
New Member
 
Taiwan, New Taipei
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Taipei, Taiwan
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 7
suraj9735 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gert-Jan View Post
What mesh did you use in WB and in fluent? Same tet mesh?
I use the same tet mesh in both Mechanical and Fluent.

Mesh size= approx 300000 elements
suraj9735 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 19, 2018, 09:18
Default
  #5
Senior Member
 
Gert-Jan
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,827
Rep Power: 27
Gert-Jan will become famous soon enough
What Type? Tet mesh?
Gert-Jan is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 19, 2018, 09:31
Default
  #6
New Member
 
Taiwan, New Taipei
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Taipei, Taiwan
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 7
suraj9735 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gert-Jan View Post
What Type? Tet mesh?
That mesh was automatically generated within the Mesh module of ANSYS.
suraj9735 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 19, 2018, 09:36
Default
  #7
New Member
 
Taiwan, New Taipei
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Taipei, Taiwan
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 7
suraj9735 is on a distinguished road
Here is the picture of tet mesh. I am new to the CFD, have very less experience with meshing.
Attached Images
File Type: png Capture.PNG (108.4 KB, 8 views)
suraj9735 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 19, 2018, 09:48
Default
  #8
Senior Member
 
Gert-Jan
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,827
Rep Power: 27
Gert-Jan will become famous soon enough
Mechanical is a FEM package. That will treat tet-mesh properly.
Fluent is a FVM Package. That will not treat tet-mesh properly. To get better results, I suggest to:
- create a uniform tet mesh;
- even better: convert it to poly mesh in fluent;
- best: create a hex mesh.
Gert-Jan is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FSI Transient Thermal Analysis Abduri CFX 1 January 1, 2017 22:54
ANSYS ICEPAK Transient simulation - waveguide thermal analysis chris92jc ANSYS 1 October 13, 2015 08:11
execute udf in ss & transient simulation hosseinhgf FLUENT 0 December 1, 2010 08:41
transient simulation of a rotating rectangle icesniffer CFX 1 August 8, 2009 07:25
Info: Short Course On Thermal Design of Electronic Equipment Arnold Free Main CFD Forum 0 August 10, 1999 10:18


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 21:14.