|
[Sponsors] |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Jul 2019
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 6 ![]() |
Hello
I am trying to validate my CFD model using the experimental data published in the literature. However, I am not very sure on the CFD model validation procedure since the geometry of my model is different from the geometry used for the experimental setup... does this mean that I should simulate the geometry of the experimental and compare my CFD results with the results obtained in literature??? Then if the two match, I can change the geometry to my geometry??? Will that make my model valid ? Or should I simulate my model using their fluid and then use dimensionless variables to compare between their experimental results of their geometry and my CFD results of my geometry ?? I thought that the results produced by CFD also depend on the geometry on the model. I am sorry if my question isn’t very clear, I feel a bit confused on the validation process. Thank you !! Any help will be greatly appreciated! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Data Center Simulation | scottg | Main CFD Forum | 8 | February 11, 2024 06:17 |
Pump CAD + experimental data for CFD verification study | bemism | Main CFD Forum | 0 | July 20, 2017 15:30 |
Experimental data for validation of a 2D conv-div nozzle in mach range 0.2-2.0 | DDikeshorn | Main CFD Forum | 0 | January 18, 2017 04:56 |
Experimental data validation and/or grid independence | svp | Main CFD Forum | 5 | June 6, 2014 03:24 |
Statistical validation of CFD model | Matthew Brannock | Main CFD Forum | 0 | November 13, 2000 17:56 |