CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS

CFX vs. Fluent significantly different results with the same settings, bc

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   February 26, 2024, 09:04
Default CFX vs. Fluent significantly different results with the same settings, bc
New Member
Join Date: Oct 2023
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 2
CAP_NJ is on a distinguished road
Dear all,
I have simulated a ducted fan config (see figure) with CFX AND Fluent with the same boundary conditions - pt Inlet and p Outlet and the same RPM. I have used the default turbulence settings etc. in both cases, hence they differ slighlty to each other. However, when I am calculating the overall force (thrust) in z direction I get significantly different results for both solvers. I am aware of the importance in setting the reference pressure in Fluent correctly, since it is sensitive to the results (see second equation). I dont get the advantage of relating the pressure to a reference pressure (why is it reducing round off errors). As far as I know, CFX is estimating the force by the accumulation of pressure and viscous force on each surface but I couldnt find any mathematical definition in user guides. In Fluent I get -212N and in CFX -68N which means the force in cfx is only about a third as high as the one calculated in fluent. Even when I include the reference pressure in CFX as done in fluent, the result is completely different (changing from -68N to +266.25N). I dont think the difference can be explained by the differences in turbulence settings (while both are using SST) etc. Do you know where the difference comes from??? I am really grateful for every help you can provide!!!

Last edited by CAP_NJ; February 26, 2024 at 11:46.
CAP_NJ is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 27, 2024, 03:08
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,835
Rep Power: 27
Gert-Jan will become famous soon enough
It can depend on lot of things.
I have performed many calculations using Fluent and CFX. What I noticed is that using transient simulations helped a lot. That brought both together.
Regarding the pressures, both CFX and fluent have a reference pressure. The density depends on this pressure, as well as on the inlet and outlet pressure. So everything should be fine here.
I prefer CFX for rotating equipment. It is meant for that. Fluent is much less convenient for transient calculations. Regarding the forces, you can look them up in the output file. They are given by default in the summary at the end of the run. No need to determine them in Post.
Gert-Jan is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 27, 2024, 10:33
New Member
Join Date: Oct 2023
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 2
CAP_NJ is on a distinguished road
Thanks a lot for your response!!!

It doesn't seem to be intuitive, cause when I turn on "include reference pressure to true" in CFX the result is completely different. When I switch it off it is similar to the fluent result. Although the reference pressure inclusion is always on in fluent. That seems contradictory to me...I would favor CFX in my case but it is not possible to use the ffowcs williams model, which is based on the transient results of fluent. So it is a data format issue, I guess.
CAP_NJ is offline   Reply With Quote


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
About the differences in results obtained from CFX and Fluent Ryuzaki CFX 2 December 27, 2023 17:40
Simulation results of cfx and fluent are different. dhehdxhdaus FLUENT 1 August 10, 2022 02:20
Fluent Meshing for CFX opinions siw CFX 1 April 25, 2022 06:55
Transfer Fluent Results to CFX yanqoue FLUENT 0 September 9, 2016 09:18
Different Results from Fluent 5.5 and Fluent 6.0 Rajeev Kumar Singh FLUENT 6 December 19, 2010 11:33

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:23.