# Introducing normalized velocity

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 February 11, 2013, 09:56 Introducing normalized velocity #1 Senior Member   Govindaraju Join Date: Apr 2010 Posts: 207 Rep Power: 10 Sponsored Links Dear friends I would like to introduce normalized velocity profile as an input. The velocity changes with respect to time under different condition. So I did normalized the data (0 to 1). Now the output data has no unit ( assume I am correct). How to introduce this normalized data to the input boundary condition in the velocity field? Thank you for your kind attention Regards Govind

 February 11, 2013, 18:15 #2 Super Moderator   Glenn Horrocks Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Sydney, Australia Posts: 13,736 Rep Power: 106 Velocity boundaries need an input in units of length/time, so you just need to un-normalise it. Alternately you can trick CFX into using non-dimensional inputs providing you work the unit change through all units in the simulation and end up with a consistent set of units (which are actually unitless ). Using this you can do non-dimensional simulations in CFX.

February 11, 2013, 23:53
#3
Senior Member

Govindaraju
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 207
Rep Power: 10
Quote:
 Originally Posted by ghorrocks Velocity boundaries need an input in units of length/time, so you just need to un-normalise it. Alternately you can trick CFX into using non-dimensional inputs providing you work the unit change through all units in the simulation and end up with a consistent set of units (which are actually unitless ). Using this you can do non-dimensional simulations in CFX.
Dear Mr. Glenn

That means I have to choose simply all the dimensionless number to velocity unit. Am I correct?

If this is the case, the maximum velocity becomes 1 m/s and minimum velocity becomes 0 m/s.

in my data at t=0, the normalized value is 0.7070 . this value corresponds to
0.2375 m/s ( un normalized value).

In a global initialization, what is the initial value at t= 0 s? . Is it 0.7070 or 0.2375?
( I put at t=0, velocity 0.7070 m/s).

If I use normalized value , one simulation is sufficient. Am I correct?

If I want to change the input parameter for the next result, what is the procedure?

( Note: If I use normalized method other set of readings also traces the same value )

Thank you

Regards

Govind

 February 12, 2013, 07:08 #4 Super Moderator   Glenn Horrocks Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Sydney, Australia Posts: 13,736 Rep Power: 106 No matter what you do the unit system you use has to be consistent. It can either be a non-dimensional scheme or a quasi-dimensional scheme (simply un-normalising your velocities). What is the best approach will depend on what information you know and what you are trying to achieve.

February 12, 2013, 07:26
#5
Senior Member

Govindaraju
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 207
Rep Power: 10
Quote:
 Originally Posted by ghorrocks No matter what you do the unit system you use has to be consistent. It can either be a non-dimensional scheme or a quasi-dimensional scheme (simply un-normalising your velocities). What is the best approach will depend on what information you know and what you are trying to achieve.
Thank you Mr Glenn
I will try my best

Regards

Govind

February 19, 2013, 00:18
#6
Senior Member

Shashwat
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 107
Rep Power: 7
Quote:
 Originally Posted by ghorrocks Velocity boundaries need an input in units of length/time, so you just need to un-normalise it. Alternately you can trick CFX into using non-dimensional inputs providing you work the unit change through all units in the simulation and end up with a consistent set of units (which are actually unitless ). Using this you can do non-dimensional simulations in CFX.

Dear friends

I have an CEL expression for velocity U(t)= U(max)[1+sin (4*pi*f*t- (pi/2))]

for my simulation I want to change U(max ) everytime.

If I convert into normalized, I got a same curve for all the U(max) values.

Now, is there any way to proceed with single simulation and get multiple results for different U(max) values?

Regards

Shashwat

 February 19, 2013, 04:58 #7 Super Moderator   Glenn Horrocks Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Sydney, Australia Posts: 13,736 Rep Power: 106 Do you want to see the result for a series of U(max) values in a steady state simulation? The best way to do this is to either script up a series of steady state runs, possibly using other runs as intial conditions to speed sonvergence; OR use a multiple configuration def file to do multiple setups OR use workbench to do a parametric sweep. There's three ways of doing it, you choose the one you like the best.

February 19, 2013, 22:02
#8
Senior Member

Shashwat
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 107
Rep Power: 7
Quote:
 Originally Posted by ghorrocks Do you want to see the result for a series of U(max) values in a steady state simulation? The best way to do this is to either script up a series of steady state runs, possibly using other runs as intial conditions to speed sonvergence; OR use a multiple configuration def file to do multiple setups OR use workbench to do a parametric sweep. There's three ways of doing it, you choose the one you like the best.
dear friend
No my simulations are transient simulation.

I thought in the following way,please correct me if I am wrong.

the normalized velocity curve is simillar for the series of U(max).so find the normalized factor . DO one simulation un-normalized velocity as an input and find the result in cfx post.
If I want to do series of u (max) , can I simply multiply with normalized factor?.simillary ,can I multiply the normalized factor with result in cfx post?.
is the way correct ?

Thank you

Regards

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post ashtonJ CFX 5 July 13, 2015 02:49 anita OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 7 September 25, 2012 05:35 Kali Sanjay Phoenics 0 November 6, 2006 07:10 Antech Main CFD Forum 0 April 25, 2006 02:15 chong chee nan FLUENT 0 December 29, 2001 06:13