 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
[Sponsors] | ||||
July 4, 2013, 05:57
|
physical time scale
|
#1 |
|
Member
ali
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 44
Rep Power: 12  |
How do you choose correct physical time scale?
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 4, 2013, 07:22
|
|
#2 |
|
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,703
Rep Power: 143 |
Some options:
* Use auto time scale and let the solver work it out. Usually this is a conservative estimate, that means you can go much faster. * Read the documentation as it has an extensive discussion on it. * But I usually do not bother. A start with auto time scale and accelerate it as the simulation progresses using "edit run in progress" until I get a good convergence rate. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 4, 2013, 09:15
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
ali
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 44
Rep Power: 12 |
Thanks a lot.
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Extrusion with OpenFoam problem No. Iterations 0 | Lord Kelvin | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 8 | March 28, 2016 11:08 |
| Moving mesh | Niklas Wikstrom (Wikstrom) | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 122 | June 15, 2014 06:20 |
| How to write k and epsilon before the abnormal end | xiuying | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 8 | August 27, 2013 15:33 |
| pisoFoam with k-epsilon turb blows up - Some questions | Heroic | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 26 | December 17, 2012 03:34 |
| Orifice Plate with a fully developed flow - Problems with convergence | jonmec | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 3 | July 28, 2011 05:24 |
Linear Mode
