# Problems modelling developed flow on inlet

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

May 25, 2014, 15:27
Problems modelling developed flow on inlet
#1
New Member

James
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 11
Rep Power: 14
Hi, I am trying to model a non uniform boundary condition at the inlet to represent fully developed laminar flow using CEL; but I am getting some strange results. I am following the methodology here:

http://www.arc.vt.edu/ansys_help/cfx...DefiCrea5.html

However, in my case the inlet is on the YZ plane, not in the XY plane in the example. I just noticed in the last sentence it says

"In this equation, x and y are defined as directions 1 and 2 (X and Y for Cartesian coordinate frames) respectively, in the selected reference coordinate frame."

Do you think I have a problem with referencing the coordinate where the radius is measured from?

I have attached an image of the resulting velocity across the inlet. As you can see it is not what I was aiming for i.e. fastest velocity in the center and 0 velocity at the wall.

Does anyone have any idea why this is happening or know of an alternative approach I can use to solve this problem?

Attached Images
 Boundary Problem.jpg (36.7 KB, 7 views)

Last edited by Allankey; May 25, 2014 at 16:54. Reason: Clarity

 May 25, 2014, 18:38 #2 Super Moderator   Glenn Horrocks Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Sydney, Australia Posts: 17,749 Rep Power: 143 For this approach to work you need to have the origin at the centre of the inlet boundary, and in the XY plane. If this is not the case you will need to account for the different origin location. Allankey likes this.

May 25, 2014, 18:52
#4
New Member

James
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 11
Rep Power: 14
Quote:
 1 - Create your own radius variable. For example, Myr = sqrt(y^2 + z^2).. Assuming the inlet of interest is centered respect to the coordinate frame; otherwise, adjust for the location of the coordinate frame respect to the inlet, i.e. sqrt( (y - y_o)^2 + (z - z_o)^2 )

Thank you both so much for your replies, that makes a lot more sense now! Will give it a try.

Thanks again

 Tags boundary condition u, cfx, laminar