CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > CFX

Mach number too low

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   July 1, 2014, 09:52
Default Mach number too low
New Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0
Spitti is on a distinguished road
Dear CFD-Online community,

for my diploma work I'm simulating the flow through an aircraft engine core compressor. A company supplied me with geometry and boundary conditions, and the flow field I simulated with that looks reasonable. There's only the major problem that my Mach number is drastically lower than theirs.

All my research how that could be turned up nothing, I'm all out of ideas, you would really help me if you have some ideas of your own for a Mach number discrepancy.

I'll explain my calculation in detail. Attached sketches can also help you visualize it. My results are compared to a through flow calculation.

It's a 2D simulation on a plane with constant radius, containing 3 rows. To not simulate the whole ring, only one passage per row is gridded and periodic boundaries on the borders in circumferential direction were added. To keep mass flow constant, the pitch of every row has to be constant. Two of the rows were scaled to accomplish that. See attachment_1.

As CFX can't calculate 2D, the 2D mesh was extrused in the radial direction, equally in the direction of the hub and the direction of the shroud. Those boundaries are set to a free slip wall. A throughflow calculation showed stream tube contraction. To account for that, the height of the extrusion narrows with increasing axial coordinate. See attachment_2.

The grid is an O-grid around the airfoils with a boundary layer resolution suitable for a wall function. The freestream is gridded with an H-grid.

The inlet is defined by total pressure, total temperature and a flow direction. The outlet by a static pressure.

If there's anything more you want to know, I'm happy to oblige!
Attached Images
File Type: jpg attachment_1.jpg (22.1 KB, 10 views)
File Type: png attachment_2.png (31.7 KB, 8 views)
Spitti is offline   Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
simpleFoam parallel AndrewMortimer OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 12 August 7, 2015 18:45
decomposePar no field transfert Jeanp OpenFOAM Pre-Processing 0 June 20, 2014 05:59
Cluster ID's not contiguous in compute-nodes domain. ??? Shogan FLUENT 1 May 28, 2014 15:03
compressible at low Mach number with uniteration ricklee Main CFD Forum 2 October 20, 2005 23:15
Multicomponent fluid Andrea CFX 2 October 11, 2004 05:12

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 22:01.