|
[Sponsors] |
December 1, 2016, 16:17 |
|
#21 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,709
Rep Power: 143 |
Some comments on your setup:
* Set the reference pressure to 1 torr and the inlet to 39 torr and atmosphere to 0 torr. * Why have you got viscous work turned on? This is not going to have any viscous work done, so turn it off. * I see you have free slip walls. I guess you are trying to reproduce the very low pressure behaviour. You should look into wall modelling for low pressure flows, there are some interesting physics which goes on for low pressures. * You have a laminar flow model. Have you check the Reynolds numbers that the flow is in fact laminar? * You you confirmed your time step and convergence criteria are OK? * Your mesh is quite coarse, especially after the expansion. Have you checked you mesh density is OK? * Note that the default ideal gas model might not be a very accurate material model for this case. You might want to think about a real gas model - but they are harder to converge, so make sure you can run ideal gas reliably before considering that. * Have you had a look at the results file leading up to the crash? Save some backup files before it crashes. I bet that the crash happens when the jet first hits the outlet boundary or something like that. You have lots of things to look at |
|
December 2, 2016, 08:27 |
|
#22 |
New Member
julie
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 9 |
what can i set viscous in task?
about turbulense: i want to get simple decision i know about real gas, but i want testing the task with ideal gas if my mesh and other conditions (except wall condition temperature) with wall heat transfer coef. bad, why did my task solved? how can i heat transfer turn on? what boundary condition can i use for free gas outlet? it's last image before crach ??????????3.jpg |
|
December 3, 2016, 04:17 |
|
#23 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,709
Rep Power: 143 |
My comments mainly are for accuracy. It is possible for an inaccurate simulation to converge.
You cannot tell anything from that image. You are going to have to look at the variable fields to work out what is wrong. A clue could be to look for negative absolute pressures, they will cause divergence. Your minimum density is 1e-7 but your ambient density is around 1e-4. Where is this minimum density? What is the pressure at that point? Is it realistic, or a numerical artefact? |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Strange non vacuum behavior in DSMC DS3V | julien91 | Main CFD Forum | 5 | October 8, 2021 04:40 |
Modeling a vacuum region in solar collector with fluent | amirokhovat | FLUENT | 2 | November 4, 2016 06:36 |
radiation modeling in vacuum | mirko | OpenFOAM Programming & Development | 7 | May 20, 2016 08:31 |
Assistance in Vacuum pump simulation | enr_venkat | CFX | 5 | November 20, 2012 11:50 |
Radiation in vacuum | nitin | CFX | 0 | July 6, 2009 01:49 |